John O’Gorman
Impact in
- Biological Psychiatry top 10%
- Physiology top 5%
- Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Papers in
- Physiology 22
- Alzheimer's disease research and treatments 19
-
- Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials 6
- Co-authors
- David Shum (2 shared papers)Brett Myors (1 shared paper)Katherine Dawson (4 shared papers)Mark Novas (5 shared papers)Samantha Budd Haeberlein (19 shared papers)Leslie Williams (6 shared papers)Alvydas Mikulskis (1 shared paper)J L Ferrero (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Alzheimer s & Dementia (10 papers)Neurology (10 papers)Journal of Neurology (2 papers)Clinical Therapeutics (2 papers)JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerlandUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
John O’Gorman
47 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
- Biological Psychiatry 54
- Physiology 418
- Neurology 114
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 235
- Pharmacology 165
Countries citing papers authored by John O’Gorman
This map shows the geographic impact of John O’Gorman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John O’Gorman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John O’Gorman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John O’Gorman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John O’Gorman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John O’Gorman. The network helps show where John O’Gorman may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John O’Gorman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 132 | |
| 2 | 1984 | 122 | |
| 3 | Psychological Testing and Assessment | 2006 | 107 |
| 4 | 2001 | 104 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 93 | |
| 6 | 1997 | 87 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 86 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 74 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 74 | |
| 10 | 2003 | 73 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 59 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 48 | |
| 13 | 2023 | 47 | |
| 14 | 2018 | 39 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 32 | |
| 16 | 2023 | 25 | |
| 17 | 2000 | 12 | |
| 18 | 2024 | 11 | |
| 19 | 2016 | 9 | |
| 20 | 2018 | 9 |
About John O’Gorman
John O’Gorman is a scholar working on Physiology, Statistics and Probability, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Molecular Biology and Pharmacology, having authored 49 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (19 papers), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (8 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (6 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (6 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (4 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers), Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes (4 papers) and Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (54 citations), Physiology (418 citations), Neurology (114 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (235 citations) and Pharmacology (165 citations). John O’Gorman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include David Shum, Brett Myors, Katherine Dawson, Mark Novas, Samantha Budd Haeberlein, Leslie Williams, Alvydas Mikulskis, J L Ferrero, Jeff Sevigny and Robert J. Fox. Their work appears in journals such as Alzheimer s & Dementia, Neurology, Journal of Neurology, Clinical Therapeutics and JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.