John Moles
Impact in
- Anthropology top 0.5%
- Classical Antiquity Studies
- Historical and Literary Studies
- Classics top 2%
- Byzantine Studies and History
- Medieval Literature and History
Papers in
- Anthropology 26
- Classical Antiquity Studies 26
- Philosophy 14
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 14
- Co-authors
- Antonina Alberti (1 shared paper)David E. Hahm (1 shared paper)Jean-Louis Ferrary (1 shared paper)A. A. Long (1 shared paper)Brad Inwood (1 shared paper)Julia Annas (1 shared paper)André Laks (1 shared paper)Plutarch (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Journal of Hellenic Studies (5 papers)The Journal of Roman Studies (2 papers)Phoenix (1 paper)Hermes (1 paper)New Testament Studies (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
John Moles
39 papers receiving 621 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Anthropology 771
- Classics 180
- Archeology 446
- Philosophy 443
- Religious studies 57
Countries citing papers authored by John Moles
This map shows the geographic impact of John Moles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Moles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Moles more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Moles
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Moles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Moles. The network helps show where John Moles may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside John Moles, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1995 | 147 | |
| 2 | 1978 | 112 | |
| 3 | 1993 | 68 | |
| 4 | 1983 | 52 | |
| 5 | 2002 | 47 | |
| 6 | 1995 | 46 | |
| 7 | 1983 | 45 | |
| 8 | 1984 | 44 | |
| 9 | 1995 | 36 | |
| 10 | 2002 | 34 | |
| 11 | 1985 | 28 | |
| 12 | 1998 | 26 | |
| 13 | 1994 | 26 | |
| 14 | 1996 | 25 | |
| 15 | 1983 | 25 | |
| 16 | 1983 | 24 | |
| 17 | 2007 | 19 | |
| 18 | 1994 | 18 | |
| 19 | 2007 | 17 | |
| 20 | 1987 | 14 |
About John Moles
John Moles is a scholar working on Anthropology, Philosophy, Archeology, Organic Chemistry and Classics, having authored 45 papers that have together received 937 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (26 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (14 papers), Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods (9 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (7 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (5 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (4 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (3 papers) and Historical and Linguistic Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (771 citations), Classics (180 citations), Archeology (446 citations), Philosophy (443 citations) and Religious studies (57 citations). John Moles has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Antonina Alberti, David E. Hahm, Jean-Louis Ferrary, A. A. Long, Brad Inwood, Julia Annas, André Laks and Plutarch. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Hellenic Studies, The Journal of Roman Studies, Phoenix, Hermes and New Testament Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.