John Moles
Impact in
- Anthropology top 5%
- Classical Antiquity Studies
- Historical and Literary Studies
- Classics top 5%
- Byzantine Studies and History
Papers in
- Anthropology 17
- Classical Antiquity Studies 17
-
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 9
- Co-authors
- Plutarch (1 shared paper)Brad Inwood (1 shared paper)Jean-Louis Ferrary (1 shared paper)André Laks (1 shared paper)Julia Annas (1 shared paper)David E. Hahm (1 shared paper)Antonina Alberti (1 shared paper)A. A. Long (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Journal of Hellenic Studies (5 papers)The Journal of Roman Studies (2 papers)The American Journal of Philology (1 paper)Apeiron (1 paper)The Classical Quarterly (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
John Moles
24 papers receiving 105 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 25
- Anthropology 100
- Classics 32
- Archeology 65
- Philosophy 52
- Religious studies 19
Countries citing papers authored by John Moles
This map shows the geographic impact of John Moles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Moles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Moles more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Moles
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Moles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Moles. The network helps show where John Moles may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside John Moles, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1978 | 29 | |
| 2 | 1995 | 13 | |
| 3 | 1983 | 12 | |
| 4 | 1994 | 11 | |
| 5 | 1984 | 9 | |
| 6 | 1983 | 9 | |
| 7 | 2005 | 9 | |
| 8 | 1985 | 6 | |
| 9 | 1983 | 6 | |
| 10 | 1991 | 6 | |
| 11 | Jesus and Dionysus in The Acts of the Apostles and early Christianity | 2006 | 5 |
| 12 | 1984 | 5 | |
| 13 | 1983 | 5 | |
| 14 | 1987 | 4 | |
| 15 | 1994 | 4 | |
| 16 | The life of Cicero | 1988 | 3 |
| 17 | 2011 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2000 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2002 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1999 | 1 |
About John Moles
John Moles is a scholar working on Anthropology, Philosophy, Organic Chemistry, Archeology and Classics, having authored 27 papers that have together received 149 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (17 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (9 papers), Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods (8 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (5 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (4 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (3 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (2 papers) and Historical and Linguistic Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (100 citations), Classics (32 citations), Archeology (65 citations), Philosophy (52 citations) and Religious studies (19 citations). John Moles has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Plutarch, Brad Inwood, Jean-Louis Ferrary, André Laks, Julia Annas, David E. Hahm, Antonina Alberti and A. A. Long. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Hellenic Studies, The Journal of Roman Studies, The American Journal of Philology, Apeiron and The Classical Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.