David E. Hahm
Impact in
- Philosophy top 2%
- Classical Philosophy and Thought
- Augustinian Studies and Theology
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Medieval and Classical Philosophy
- Medieval Philosophy and Theology
- Anthropology top 5%
- Classical Antiquity Studies
Papers in
- Philosophy 12
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 12
-
- Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies 8
- Archaeology and Historical Studies 1
- Co-authors
- Brad Inwood (2 shared papers)R. E. Allen (1 shared paper)Elizabeth Asmis (1 shared paper)Margaret E. Reesor (2 shared papers)A. A. Long (1 shared paper)Fritz Graf (1 shared paper)Jean-Louis Ferrary (1 shared paper)John Moles (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The American Journal of Philology (2 papers)Phoenix (2 papers)The Southern Journal of Philosophy (1 paper)Annals of Science (1 paper)The Classical Quarterly (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
David E. Hahm
14 papers receiving 149 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Philosophy 161
- Anthropology 96
- Archeology 75
- Religious studies 21
- History and Philosophy of Science 13
Countries citing papers authored by David E. Hahm
This map shows the geographic impact of David E. Hahm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David E. Hahm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David E. Hahm more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David E. Hahm
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David E. Hahm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David E. Hahm. The network helps show where David E. Hahm may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 11 scholars most cited alongside David E. Hahm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1987 | 124 | |
| 2 | 1971 | 31 | |
| 3 | 1978 | 22 | |
| 4 | 1995 | 13 | |
| 5 | 1978 | 10 | |
| 6 | 1985 | 5 | |
| 7 | 1991 | 4 | |
| 8 | 1982 | 4 | |
| 9 | 1972 | 2 | |
| 10 | 1963 | 2 | |
| 11 | 1977 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1999 | 2 | |
| 14 | Origins of Stoic cosmology | 1977 | 1 |
| 15 | A Neglected Stoic Argument for Human Responsibility | 2016 | 0 |
About David E. Hahm
David E. Hahm is a scholar working on Philosophy, Archeology, Anthropology, Astronomy and Astrophysics and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 15 papers that have together received 224 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Philosophy and Thought (12 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (8 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (5 papers), Historical Astronomy and Related Studies (3 papers), Classical Studies and Legal History (1 paper), Free Will and Agency (1 paper), Philosophy and History of Science (1 paper) and Archaeology and Historical Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (161 citations), Anthropology (96 citations), Archeology (75 citations), Religious studies (21 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (13 citations). David E. Hahm has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Brad Inwood, R. E. Allen, Elizabeth Asmis, Margaret E. Reesor, A. A. Long, Fritz Graf, Jean-Louis Ferrary, John Moles, André Laks and Julia Annas. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Philology, Phoenix, The Southern Journal of Philosophy, Annals of Science and The Classical Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.