John Moat
Impact in
- Oncology top 10%
- Metal complexes synthesis and properties
- Organic Chemistry top 10%
- Antimicrobial agents and applications
- Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization
Papers in
-
- Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities 2
- Ecology 4
- Bacteriophages and microbial interactions 2
- Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology 2
- Co-authors
- Mathew Upton (5 shared papers)Christopher Gerard Dowson (4 shared papers)Graeme Fox (3 shared papers)Anne C Barton (3 shared papers)Stephen Eyre (3 shared papers)Madhura Castelino (3 shared papers)Pauline Ho (3 shared papers)Paul Martin (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Chemical Science (2 papers)The Lancet (1 paper)RSC Medicinal Chemistry (1 paper)Microbiology Spectrum (1 paper)ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaChina
In The Last Decade
John Moat
16 papers receiving 996 citations
John Moat's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- Oncology 355
- Organic Chemistry 276
- Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 11
- Molecular Medicine 29
- Dermatology 36
Countries citing papers authored by John Moat
This map shows the geographic impact of John Moat's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Moat with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Moat more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Moat
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Moat. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Moat. The network helps show where John Moat may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Moat, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Metal complexes as a promising source for new antibiotics Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 453 |
| 2 | 2017 | 123 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 109 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 98 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 41 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 37 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 35 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 33 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 26 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 23 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 18 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 14 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2025 | 2 |
About John Moat
John Moat is a scholar working on Microbiology, Ecology, Dermatology, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 16 papers that have together received 1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antimicrobial agents and applications (4 papers), Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing (3 papers), Dermatology and Skin Diseases (2 papers), Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities (2 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (2 papers), Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (2 papers), Metal complexes synthesis and properties (2 papers) and Infection Control in Healthcare (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (355 citations), Organic Chemistry (276 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (11 citations), Molecular Medicine (29 citations) and Dermatology (36 citations). John Moat has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and China. Frequent co-authors include Mathew Upton, Christopher Gerard Dowson, Graeme Fox, Anne C Barton, Stephen Eyre, Madhura Castelino, Pauline Ho, Paul Martin, Eleanor Jameson and Guy J. Clarkson. Their work appears in journals such as Chemical Science, The Lancet, RSC Medicinal Chemistry, Microbiology Spectrum and ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.