John Meier

38 papers receiving 557 citations

Peers

John Meier
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Geometry and Topology 446
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 60
  • Theoretical Computer Science 20
  • Mathematical Physics 54
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 71
Replace Matthew D. Foreman with:
Matthew D. Foreman United States
Michael Morley United States
Alfred B. Manaster United States
Perry Smith
F. Burton Jones United States
Steven Galovich United States
G. S. Monk United States
John P. Mayberry United Kingdom
Mauro Di Nasso Italy
W. Hugh Woodin United States
John Meier relative to Matthew D. Foreman United States Matthew D. Foreman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.2×
Matthew D. Foreman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Meier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Meier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Meier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Meier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Meier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Meier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Meier. The network helps show where John Meier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside John Meier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Meier Line = papers co-authored together John Meier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199585
2 199979
3 199850
4 199544
5 200438
6 200030
7 199629
8 200625
9 199924
10 200422
11 200217
12 200216
13 201515
14 199714
15 200413
16 200112
17 200111
18 199710
19 200510
20 20008

About John Meier

John Meier is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, Mathematical Physics, Modeling and Simulation and Applied Mathematics, having authored 41 papers that have together received 609 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geometric and Algebraic Topology (36 papers), Finite Group Theory Research (5 papers), Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (3 papers), Mathematics Education and Programs (2 papers), semigroups and automata theory (2 papers), Mathematics Education and Pedagogy (2 papers), Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (2 papers) and History and Theory of Mathematics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geometry and Topology (446 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (60 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (20 citations), Mathematical Physics (54 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (71 citations). John Meier has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Susan Hermiller, Jon McCammond, Gary Urton, Ruth M. Charney, Noel Brady, Kim Whittlesey, Kenneth S. Brown, Michael Davis, Murray J. Elder and Tadeusz Januszkiewicz. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Algebra and Computation, Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, Geometriae Dedicata and Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact