John Mark Disorbio

594 citations
26 papers · 450 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

John Mark Disorbio

26 papers receiving 392 citations

Peers

John Mark Disorbio
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Family Practice 26
  • Pharmacology 145
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 103
  • Clinical Psychology 136
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 22
Replace Daniel Bruns with:
Daniel Bruns United States
Kimi L. Carson United States
Alexandra Ferreira-Valente Portugal
Alexandra Neville Canada
Michael Dworkind Canada
Karoline Vangronsveld Belgium
Su C. Kim United States
Antoine Bioy France
Sarah E. Beals‐Erickson United States
Kjetil Karlsen Norway
John Mark Disorbio relative to Daniel Bruns United States Daniel Bruns's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Daniel Bruns · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Mark Disorbio

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Mark Disorbio's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Mark Disorbio with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Mark Disorbio more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Mark Disorbio

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Mark Disorbio. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Mark Disorbio. The network helps show where John Mark Disorbio may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside John Mark Disorbio, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Mark Disorbio Line = papers co-authored together John Mark Disorbio links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200946
2 200940
3 201038
4 200027
5 200725
6 201524
7 201321
8 200921
9 200820
10 201420
11 201019
12 201219
13 200718
14 200315
15 201014
16 201014
17 201014
18 201212
19 201411
20 201010

About John Mark Disorbio

John Mark Disorbio is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Pharmacology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 26 papers that have together received 450 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (5 papers), Workplace Violence and Bullying (5 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (5 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (3 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (2 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (2 papers), Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (1 paper) and Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (26 citations), Pharmacology (145 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (103 citations), Clinical Psychology (136 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (22 citations). John Mark Disorbio has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Denmark and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Bruns, David A. Fishbain, John E. Lewis, Jinrun Gao, Sarah L. Tragesser, R. Portenoy, Steven Simon, Damien Bennett, Steven A. Shoemaker and James E. Lewis. Their work appears in journals such as Pain Medicine, Pain Practice, Journal of Pain, Clinical Journal of Pain and Psychological Injury and Law.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact