John Mark Carter

88 papers receiving 2.8k citations

John Mark Carter's Hit Papers

Clinical Practice Guideline: Tinnitus 2014 · 571 citations
5710+4+8Years since publication100200300400500

Peers

John Mark Carter
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
  • Sensory Systems 530
  • Neurology 306
  • Endocrinology 154
  • Otorhinolaryngology 115
  • Parasitology 147
Replace Uwe Koedel with:
Uwe Koedel Germany
Geneviève Héry-Arnaud France
Matthias Klein Germany
John W Finnie Australia
Marlene L. Durand United States
Yuichi Ohashi Japan
Juliane Bubeck Wardenburg United States
Penny A. Asbell United States
Henry Koziel United States
Philipp Henneke Germany
John Mark Carter relative to Uwe Koedel Germany Uwe Koedel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×9.0×
Uwe Koedel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Mark Carter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Mark Carter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Mark Carter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Mark Carter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Mark Carter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Mark Carter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Mark Carter. The network helps show where John Mark Carter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Mark Carter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Mark Carter Line = papers co-authored together John Mark Carter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 94 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Clinical Practice Guideline: Tinnitus
Hit paper breakdown →
2014571
2 1990204
3 1997153
4 1995149
5 2000147
6 1996109
7 199094
8 201485
9 199076
10 201269
11 200763
12 201152
13 201452
14 200848
15 201846
16 200643
17 200039
18 201336
19 199434
20 198834

About John Mark Carter

John Mark Carter is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Otorhinolaryngology, Infectious Diseases, Immunology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 94 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (10 papers), Escherichia coli research studies (9 papers), Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding (8 papers), Trace Elements in Health (7 papers), Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (6 papers), Toxin Mechanisms and Immunotoxins (5 papers), vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches (5 papers) and Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (530 citations), Neurology (306 citations), Endocrinology (154 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (115 citations) and Parasitology (147 citations). John Mark Carter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Brian K. Kay, Xiaohua He, Bruce Onisko, B. Kim Lee Sim, Christopher J. Silva, Irina C. Dynin, J. David Haynes, Melissa L. Erickson‐Beltran, Jeffrey David Chulay and Nils B. Adey. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, Otolaryngology, American Journal of Hematology and American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact