John Maddison

17 papers receiving 580 citations

John Maddison's Hit Papers

Deep learning for prediction of colorectal cancer outcome: a discovery and validation study 2020 · 429 citations
4290+2+4Years since publication100200300400

Peers

John Maddison
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Health Informatics 38
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 226
  • Ophthalmology 56
  • Artificial Intelligence 210
  • Oncology 137
Replace Benoît Schmauch with:
Benoît Schmauch France
Behnaz Abdollahi United States
Mehdi Alilou United States
Xiao Hu China
David Romo‐Bucheli Colombia
Sepp de Raedt Denmark
Ole-Johan Skrede Norway
John Arne Nesheim Norway
Cheng Jin China
Lily H. Peng United States
John Maddison relative to Benoît Schmauch France Benoît Schmauch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Benoît Schmauch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Maddison

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Maddison's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Maddison with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Maddison more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Maddison

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Maddison. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Maddison. The network helps show where John Maddison may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Maddison, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Maddison Line = papers co-authored together John Maddison links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1
Deep learning for prediction of colorectal cancer outcome: a discovery and validation study
Hit paper breakdown →
2020429
2 202141
3 202034
4 200914
5 200513
6
Analysing the 3D Structure of Blood Vessels using Confocal Microscopy
200213
7 201411
8 202410
9 20208
10 20245
11 20254
12 20243
13 20061
14 20241
15 20001
16 20251
17
3-dimensional analysis of vascular structure, function & receptor distribution using confocal laser scanning microscopy
20001
18 20240

About John Maddison

John Maddison is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Artificial Intelligence, Molecular Biology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 18 papers that have together received 590 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Imaging and Analysis (3 papers), Optical Coherence Tomography Applications (1 paper), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (1 paper), Advanced Vision and Imaging (1 paper), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (1 paper), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (1 paper) and Machine Learning in Healthcare (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (38 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (226 citations), Ophthalmology (56 citations), Artificial Intelligence (210 citations) and Oncology (137 citations). John Maddison has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Knut Liestøl, John Arne Nesheim, Håvard E. Danielsen, Tarjei S. Hveem, Enric Domingo, Ole-Johan Skrede, Andreas Kleppe, Arild Nesbakken, Sepp de Raedt and Marco Novelli. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Pathology, Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics, Histopathology, Age and Ageing and The Lancet.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact