Tom Hugh

1.7k citations
35 papers · 467 · h-index 13

Impact in

  • Hepatology top 2%
    • Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
    • Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment

Papers in

    • Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis 25
    • Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies 4

Tom Hugh

30 papers receiving 458 citations

Peers

Tom Hugh
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
  • Hepatology 262
  • Epidemiology 71
  • Health Informatics 3
  • Cancer Research 29
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 59
Replace Ning‐lin Ge with:
Ning‐lin Ge China
Rishika Sharma United States
Caroline Ripat United States
Marco P. A. W. Claasen Canada
Shun‐ichi Ariizumi Japan
S. Vavassori Italy
Alessandro Germini Italy
S.M. Ibrahim United States
H. Hokotate Japan
Barbara Ginanni Italy
Tom Hugh relative to Ning‐lin Ge China Ning‐lin Ge's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20.5×
Ning‐lin Ge · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tom Hugh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Hugh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Hugh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Hugh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Hugh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Hugh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Hugh. The network helps show where Tom Hugh may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tom Hugh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tom Hugh Line = papers co-authored together Tom Hugh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201755
2 201950
3 202050
4 201935
5 202031
6 202127
7 202021
8 202020
9 202119
10 202117
11 202217
12 202116
13 202312
14 202212
15 202212
16 202210
17 20229
18 20219
19 20208
20 20245

About Tom Hugh

Tom Hugh is a scholar working on Hepatology, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 467 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (25 papers), Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies (4 papers), Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis (2 papers), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (1 paper), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (1 paper), Frailty in Older Adults (1 paper), Renal cell carcinoma treatment (1 paper) and Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Hepatology (262 citations), Epidemiology (71 citations), Health Informatics (3 citations), Cancer Research (29 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (59 citations). Tom Hugh has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Hugo P. Marques, Vincent Lam, Guillaume Martel, Sorin Alexandrescu, Alfredo Guglielmi, George A. Poultsides, Irinel Popescu, Luca Aldrighetti, Francesca Ratti and Olivier Soubrane. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Surgical Oncology, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, HPB, Surgery and European Journal of Surgical Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact