John MacFarlane

20 papers receiving 261 citations

Peers

John MacFarlane
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Condensed Matter Physics 46
  • Philosophy 38
  • History and Philosophy of Science 12
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 25
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 58
Replace Vincenzo Fano with:
Vincenzo Fano Italy
André Fuhrmann Germany
S. Marks United States
Michael E. MacDonald United States
K H Reich Switzerland
William D. Mitchell United States
Millais Culpin United Kingdom
Werner Blum Germany
Richard Dien Winfield United States
Yaron Lehavi Israel
John MacFarlane relative to Vincenzo Fano Italy Vincenzo Fano's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.5×
Vincenzo Fano · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John MacFarlane

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John MacFarlane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John MacFarlane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John MacFarlane more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John MacFarlane

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John MacFarlane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John MacFarlane. The network helps show where John MacFarlane may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside John MacFarlane, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John MacFarlane Line = papers co-authored together John MacFarlane links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200557
2 200536
3 200232
4 200321
5 200221
6 198920
7 201418
8 198513
9 201312
10 199210
11 201410
12 20129
13 20079
14 20106
15 20024
16 20073
17 20202
18 20032
19 20052
20 19901

About John MacFarlane

John MacFarlane is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Radiation and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 21 papers that have together received 289 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (7 papers), Superconducting and THz Device Technology (4 papers), Microwave Engineering and Waveguides (2 papers), Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies (2 papers), Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (2 papers), Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods (1 paper), Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies (1 paper) and Complex Systems and Decision Making (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (46 citations), Philosophy (38 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (12 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (25 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (58 citations). John MacFarlane has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Brunei. Frequent co-authors include John C. Gallop, Julia A. Davies, Patrick Josephs-Franks, Peter G. Bennett, David W. Graham, Chris G. Carr, Robert L. Hawkes, Jia Du, E. J. Nicol and Peter A. Krug. Their work appears in journals such as Superconductor Science and Technology, The Philosophical Review, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Nature Medicine and IEICE Transactions on Electronics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact