Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases

81.4k citations
2.8k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
    • Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
    • Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
    • Parasites and Host Interactions

Papers in

    • Antifungal resistance and susceptibility 141
    • Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus 83
    • Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology 75
    • Reproductive tract infections research 100

Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases

2.2k papers receiving 64.2k citations

Peers

Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases
Comparison fields: 5 of 213
  • Infectious Diseases 25.6k
  • Parasitology 7.7k
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 1.9k
  • Microbiology 5.6k
  • Molecular Medicine 4.4k
Replace Infectious Disease Clinics of North America with:
Infectious Disease Clinics of North America United States
Infection Germany
Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy United States
Eurosurveillance Sweden
Journal of Infection United Kingdom
Future Microbiology United States
Nature Microbiology United States
Current Opinion in Microbiology United States
BMC Microbiology China
The Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases Brazil
Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases relative to Infectious Disease Clinics of North America United States Infectious Disease Clinics of North America's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Infectious Disease Clinics of North America · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases.

About Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases

The 2.8k papers published in Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases in the last decades have received a total of 81.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases usually cover Infectious Diseases (641 papers), Microbiology (180 papers), Epidemiology (769 papers), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (43 papers) and Virology (92 papers) specifically the topics of Antifungal resistance and susceptibility (141 papers), Fungal Infections and Studies (106 papers), Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections (104 papers), Reproductive tract infections research (100 papers), Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research (99 papers), Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (83 papers), Respiratory viral infections research (77 papers) and Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (75 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases are Keith G Harding, Scott B. Halstead, Donato Cioli, Anna María Geretti, Louis M. Weiss, Elizabeth S. Didier, Christopher M. Parry, Frederick G. Hayden, Andreas F. Widmer and Timothy F. Murphy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact