John Ma
Impact in
- Anthropology top 5%
- Classical Antiquity Studies
- Historical and Literary Studies
- Archeology top 2%
- Archaeology and Historical Studies
- Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History
- Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
- Ancient Near East History
Papers in
- Anthropology 17
- Classical Antiquity Studies 16
- Classics 9
- Byzantine Studies and History 9
- Co-authors
- Peter H.R. Green (1 shared paper)William G. Roberts (1 shared paper)Ann M. Ginsberg (1 shared paper)Nalini Raghavachari (1 shared paper)Hitoshi Omi (1 shared paper)Faiyaz Ahmad (1 shared paper)Steven Hockman (1 shared paper)Weixing Shen (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Past & Present (1 paper)Cell Cycle (1 paper)The American Journal of Medicine (1 paper)The American Historical Review (1 paper)Annales Histoire Sciences Sociales (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
John Ma
18 papers receiving 177 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Anthropology 184
- Archeology 127
- Classics 44
- Parasitology 29
- Religious studies 18
Countries citing papers authored by John Ma
This map shows the geographic impact of John Ma's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Ma with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Ma more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Ma
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Ma. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Ma. The network helps show where John Ma may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 12 scholars most cited alongside John Ma, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 75 | |
| 2 | 2003 | 61 | |
| 3 | 2001 | 43 | |
| 4 | 1989 | 34 | |
| 5 | 1994 | 23 | |
| 6 | 2000 | 16 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 14 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2008 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2010 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 19 | Novel Multidimensional Tracers for Geothermal Inter-Well Diagnostics | 2013 | 1 |
| 20 | 2012 | 1 |
About John Ma
John Ma is a scholar working on Anthropology, Classics, Archeology, Sociology and Political Science and Molecular Biology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 293 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (16 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (9 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (6 papers), Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (4 papers), Ancient Near East History (3 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (2 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (1 paper) and Drilling and Well Engineering (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (184 citations), Archeology (127 citations), Classics (44 citations), Parasitology (29 citations) and Religious studies (18 citations). John Ma has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Peter H.R. Green, William G. Roberts, Ann M. Ginsberg, Nalini Raghavachari, Hitoshi Omi, Faiyaz Ahmad, Steven Hockman, Weixing Shen, Vincent Manganiello and S. Vaddadi. Their work appears in journals such as Past & Present, Cell Cycle, The American Journal of Medicine, The American Historical Review and Annales Histoire Sciences Sociales.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.