John M. Pullen

436 citations
46 papers · 226 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

John M. Pullen

40 papers receiving 138 citations

Peers

John M. Pullen
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 88
  • Economics and Econometrics 138
  • Sociology and Political Science 149
  • Political Science and International Relations 45
  • History and Philosophy of Science 7
Replace David Chilosi with:
David Chilosi United Kingdom
Leticia Arroyo Abad United States
Luís Bértola Uruguay
Clive Trebilcock United States
Lionel Robbins
Liam Brunt Norway
Carol Scott Leonard Russia
Richard Nelson Bean United States
Victor D. Lippit United States
James Steuart United Kingdom
John M. Pullen relative to David Chilosi United Kingdom David Chilosi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
David Chilosi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John M. Pullen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John M. Pullen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John M. Pullen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John M. Pullen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John M. Pullen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John M. Pullen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John M. Pullen. The network helps show where John M. Pullen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside John M. Pullen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John M. Pullen Line = papers co-authored together John M. Pullen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198127
2 198222
3 201018
4 201711
5 19819
6 19889
7
The Marginal Productivity Theory of Distribution: A Critical History
20098
8 20018
9 20098
10 19957
11 20016
12 19986
13 20136
14 20066
15 20165
16 19875
17 19784
18 19894
19 19714
20 20103

About John M. Pullen

John M. Pullen is a scholar working on General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Law and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 46 papers that have together received 226 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic Theory and Policy (26 papers), Political Economy and Marxism (25 papers), Economic Theory and Institutions (16 papers), Australian History and Society (4 papers), Political Theory and Influence (3 papers), Property Rights and Legal Doctrine (3 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (2 papers) and Land Rights and Reforms (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (88 citations), Economics and Econometrics (138 citations), Sociology and Political Science (149 citations), Political Science and International Relations (45 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (7 citations). John M. Pullen has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Hitoshi Hashimoto, Alan E. Treloar, Philippa Watson and E. Anthony Wrigley. Their work appears in journals such as History of Political Economy, American Journal of Economics and Sociology, European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part B Journal of Engineering Manufacture and Cambridge Journal of Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact