History of Political Economy

2.5k papers and 20.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.5k papers published in History of Political Economy in the last decades have received a total of 20.0k indexed citations. Papers published in History of Political Economy usually cover Economics and Econometrics (1.4k papers), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (842 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (772 papers) specifically the topics of Economic Theory and Institutions (1.2k papers), Economic Theory and Policy (811 papers) and Political Economy and Marxism (626 papers). The most active scholars publishing in History of Political Economy are Robert Léonard, Philip Mirowski, Mark Blaug, Mauro Boianovsky, E.-M. Sent, Roger E. Backhouse, Steven G. Medema, Malcolm Rutherford, George J. Stigler and Bruce Caldwell.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in History of Political Economy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in History of Political Economy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in History of Political Economy.

Countries where authors publish in History of Political Economy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in History of Political Economy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in History of Political Economy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites History of Political Economy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025