John M. Efron

16 papers receiving 180 citations

Peers

John M. Efron
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • History 66
  • General Psychology 7
  • Sociology and Political Science 197
  • Political Science and International Relations 83
  • Demography 38
Replace Léon Poliakov with:
Léon Poliakov
Ralph Leck United States
Rudolph Binion United States
R. S. Sugirtharajah United Kingdom
Steven Beller United States
Steven J. Zipperstein United States
H. Glenn Penny United States
Elizabeth A. Castelli United States
J. W. Rogerson United Kingdom
Ritchie Robertson United States
John M. Efron relative to Léon Poliakov Léon Poliakov's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.4×
Léon Poliakov · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John M. Efron

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John M. Efron's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John M. Efron with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John M. Efron more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John M. Efron

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John M. Efron. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John M. Efron. The network helps show where John M. Efron may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside John M. Efron, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John M. Efron Line = papers co-authored together John M. Efron links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Defenders of the Race: Jewish Doctors and Race Science in Fin-de-Siècle Europe
1994110
2 199488
3 201529
4 200225
5 200120
6 200114
7 20049
8 20134
9 20083
10 20183
11 20023
12 19972
13 20062
14
When is a Yid not a Jew? The Strange Case of Supporter Identity at Tottenham Hotspur
20062
15 20121
16 19961
17 19941
18 19951
19 20131
20 20181

About John M. Efron

John M. Efron is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, History, Political Science and International Relations, Philosophy and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 26 papers that have together received 320 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (16 papers), Medical History and Research (8 papers), Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics (2 papers), Religion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity (2 papers), Race, History, and American Society (2 papers), Sports, Gender, and Society (2 papers), Jewish Identity and Society (2 papers) and Race, Genetics, and Society (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (66 citations), General Psychology (7 citations), Sociology and Political Science (197 citations), Political Science and International Relations (83 citations) and Demography (38 citations). John M. Efron has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Albrecht Classen, David B. Ruderman, Richard Weikart, Bernard Wasserstein, Matthias Lehmann, Steven Weitzman and Sander L. Gilman. Their work appears in journals such as The Jewish Quarterly Review, German Studies Review, Sport in History, The Journal of Interdisciplinary History and Human Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact