This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Shofar. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Shofar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shofar more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Shofar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Shofar.
About Shofar
The 950 papers published in Shofar in the last decades have received a total of 2.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Shofar usually cover Religious studies (142 papers), Demography (180 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (151 papers), Sociology and Political Science (572 papers) and History (111 papers) specifically the topics of Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (442 papers), Jewish Identity and Society (179 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (122 papers), American Jewish Fiction Analysis (73 papers), Middle East Politics and Society (47 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (45 papers), Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration (44 papers) and Race, History, and American Society (41 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Shofar are Joël Beinin, James Armstrong, Victor H. Matthews, Ira M. Sheskin, Jeffrey Glanz, Jeffrey Shandler, Gerd Bayer, Jonathan Freedman, Josh Kun and Louis E. Newman.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.