John M. Eason

34 papers receiving 439 citations

Peers

John M. Eason
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • General Health Professions 195
  • Health 63
  • Sociology and Political Science 315
  • Clinical Psychology 77
  • Education 87
Replace William J. Sabol with:
William J. Sabol United States
Natalie Kroovand Hipple United States
Barbara Rylko‐Bauer United States
Jacob I. Stowell United States
Megan Reid United States
Ruth Huber United States
Felicia M. Mitchell United States
Keith D. Parker United States
Alvaro Cortes United States
Patricia Hynes United Kingdom
John M. Eason relative to William J. Sabol United States William J. Sabol's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
William J. Sabol · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John M. Eason

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John M. Eason's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John M. Eason with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John M. Eason more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John M. Eason

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John M. Eason. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John M. Eason. The network helps show where John M. Eason may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John M. Eason, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John M. Eason Line = papers co-authored together John M. Eason links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013109
2 201661
3 201046
4 201225
5 201625
6
Big House on the Prairie: Rise of the Rural Ghetto and Prison Proliferation
201724
7 201722
8 201820
9 202116
10 202214
11 201713
12 201711
13 201611
14 202310
15 20219
16 20209
17 20218
18 20217
19 20157
20
Treatment Inequity: Examining the Influence of Non-Hispanic Black Race and Ethnicity on Pancreatic Cancer Care and Survival in Wisconsin.
20225

About John M. Eason

John M. Eason is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Education and Social Psychology, having authored 41 papers that have together received 487 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (20 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (17 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (14 papers), Education Discipline and Inequality (7 papers), Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (5 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (4 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (3 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (195 citations), Health (63 citations), Sociology and Political Science (315 citations), Clinical Psychology (77 citations) and Education (87 citations). John M. Eason has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Daniel T. Lichter, Linda M. Burton, Regina Baker, Jamilia J. Blake, Miner P. Marchbanks, Anthony A. Peguero, Danielle Wallace, Sherry Towers, Christopher Wildeman and Tony H. Grubesic. Their work appears in journals such as Sociology of Race and Ethnicity, Punishment & Society, Journal of Clinical Oncology, GeoJournal and Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact