John M. Donovań

893 citations
32 papers · 653 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

John M. Donovań

31 papers receiving 616 citations

Peers

John M. Donovań
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Hepatology 153
  • Transplantation 36
  • Urology 58
  • Surgery 290
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 197
Replace Ş. Sevmiş with:
Ş. Sevmiş Türkiye
Maria Luisa Melzi Italy
Joaquim Maurício da Motta-Leal-Filho Brazil
Eugene F. Fuchs United States
Sadık Tamsel Türkiye
Luiz Ronaldo Alberti Brazil
Peter K. Kottmeier United States
Simon M. Gruenewald Australia
O Leiva Spain
Jemma Mytton United Kingdom
John M. Donovań relative to Ş. Sevmiş Türkiye Ş. Sevmiş's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Ş. Sevmiş · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John M. Donovań

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John M. Donovań's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John M. Donovań with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John M. Donovań more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John M. Donovań

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John M. Donovań. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John M. Donovań. The network helps show where John M. Donovań may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John M. Donovań, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John M. Donovań Line = papers co-authored together John M. Donovań links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006203
2 199365
3 198955
4
Primary sclerosing cholangitis: the emerging role for liver transplantation.
199050
5 198835
6 198627
7 198927
8 199024
9 199023
10 199619
11 200018
12 200617
13 198713
14 199812
15
The Value Enterprise: Strategies for Building a Value-Based Organization
199810
16 19888
17 19806
18
Value-Creating Growth: How to Lift Your Company to the Next Level of Performance
19996
19 20045
20 20195

About John M. Donovań

John M. Donovań is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Urology, Hepatology and Epidemiology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 653 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments (6 papers), Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (6 papers), Urological Disorders and Treatments (3 papers), Liver Disease and Transplantation (3 papers), Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (3 papers), Geological Modeling and Analysis (2 papers), Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (2 papers) and Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Hepatology (153 citations), Transplantation (36 citations), Urology (58 citations), Surgery (290 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (197 citations). John M. Donovań has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Kenya. Frequent co-authors include George W. Drach, Thomas H. Stanisic, Gagandeep Singh, Yuri Genyk, Nicholas Jabbour, Rodrigo Mateo, Maria Stapfer, Judith Kahn, Linda Sher and S. Aswad. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Urology, Urologic Clinics of North America, Investigative Radiology, American Journal of Transplantation and Techniques and methods.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact