John Koethe
Impact in
- Philosophy top 0.5%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Papers in
- Philosophy 11
- Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications 5
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 5
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 1
- Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education 1
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 7
- Co-authors
- Peter Unger (1 shared paper)Hilary Putnam (1 shared paper)Elizabeth Wolgast (1 shared paper)Dale Jacquette (1 shared paper)John Ashbery (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Philosophical Review (4 papers)Midwest Studies in Philosophy (3 papers)New Literary History (2 papers)Synthese (1 paper)Philosophical Studies (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
John Koethe
23 papers receiving 364 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Philosophy 378
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 262
- History and Philosophy of Science 71
- Family Practice 12
- Cognitive Neuroscience 98
Countries citing papers authored by John Koethe
This map shows the geographic impact of John Koethe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Koethe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Koethe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Koethe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Koethe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Koethe. The network helps show where John Koethe may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside John Koethe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1978 | 284 | |
| 2 | 2002 | 54 | |
| 3 | 1979 | 50 | |
| 4 | 1979 | 15 | |
| 5 | 1996 | 14 | |
| 6 | 2008 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2000 | 10 | |
| 8 | 1978 | 10 | |
| 9 | 1978 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2009 | 5 | |
| 11 | 1973 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2003 | 4 | |
| 13 | 1991 | 3 | |
| 14 | 1977 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1999 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2005 | 2 | |
| 17 | 1982 | 2 | |
| 18 | 1983 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2001 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1983 | 2 |
About John Koethe
John Koethe is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory, Artificial Intelligence and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 28 papers that have together received 490 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (7 papers), Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications (5 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (5 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (3 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (3 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (1 paper), Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (1 paper) and Philosophy and History of Science (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (378 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (262 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (71 citations), Family Practice (12 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (98 citations). John Koethe has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Peter Unger, Hilary Putnam, Elizabeth Wolgast, Dale Jacquette and John Ashbery. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Review, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, New Literary History, Synthese and Philosophical Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.