John J. Bowling

640 citations
28 papers · 471 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

    • Chemical Synthesis and Analysis 5
    • Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies 2
    • Natural product bioactivities and synthesis 2
    • Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis 5

John J. Bowling

27 papers receiving 458 citations

Peers

John J. Bowling
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Biotechnology 159
  • Pharmacology 106
  • Toxicology 18
  • Organic Chemistry 146
  • Cancer Research 46
Replace Noer Kasanah with:
Noer Kasanah Indonesia
Komal Anjum China
Xixiang Tang China
A. S. Dmitrenok Russia
M.A. Mojid Mondol South Korea
Luís Cézar Rodrigues Brazil
Zhizeng Gao China
Gaiyun Zhang China
Doug R. Braun United States
Xuemei Hou China
John J. Bowling relative to Noer Kasanah Indonesia Noer Kasanah's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Noer Kasanah · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John J. Bowling

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John J. Bowling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John J. Bowling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John J. Bowling more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John J. Bowling

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John J. Bowling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John J. Bowling. The network helps show where John J. Bowling may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John J. Bowling, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John J. Bowling Line = papers co-authored together John J. Bowling links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200656
2 200849
3 201147
4 200436
5 201733
6 201627
7 200027
8 200925
9 200623
10 201223
11 201220
12 201620
13 201619
14 201815
15 201315
16 20079
17 20148
18 20105
19 20103
20 20223

About John J. Bowling

John J. Bowling is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pharmacology, Biotechnology, Ocean Engineering and Infectious Diseases, having authored 28 papers that have together received 471 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Marine Sponges and Natural Products (7 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (5 papers), Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (5 papers), Marine Biology and Environmental Chemistry (3 papers), Drilling and Well Engineering (3 papers), Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods (3 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (2 papers) and Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (159 citations), Pharmacology (106 citations), Toxicology (18 citations), Organic Chemistry (146 citations) and Cancer Research (46 citations). John J. Bowling has collaborated with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Mark T. Hamann, Michelle Kelly, Stephen O. Duke, Raymond F. Schinazi, Jiangnan Peng, Subagus Wahyuono, Amanda L. Waters, James W. Sims, Muhammad Yousaf and Huayue Li. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Natural Products, Phytochemistry, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry and Marine Biotechnology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact