John I. Rees

42 papers receiving 912 citations

Peers

John I. Rees
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Complementary and Manual Therapy 86
  • Hardware and Architecture 171
  • Software 53
  • Artificial Intelligence 337
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 165
Replace Thomas Hallgren with:
Thomas Hallgren Sweden
Pranay Sinha United States
Ariel Cohen France
WILLIAM S. MCCUNE United States
William B. Silverman United States
Masaki Yamamoto Japan
Luca Paolini Italy
Spyros P. Potamianos Greece
Diana M. Quinlan Canada
John I. Rees relative to Thomas Hallgren Sweden Thomas Hallgren's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×28.7×
Thomas Hallgren · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John I. Rees

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John I. Rees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John I. Rees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John I. Rees more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John I. Rees

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John I. Rees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John I. Rees. The network helps show where John I. Rees may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John I. Rees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John I. Rees Line = papers co-authored together John I. Rees links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1986429
2 2000111
3 199855
4 201045
5 199841
6 199839
7 199128
8 200626
9 199625
10 199721
11
Screening for hyperlipidaemia in childhood. Recommendations of the British Hyperlipidaemia Association.
199620
12 199719
13 200116
14 198214
15 201713
16 200711
17 201811
18 199010
19 198810
20 20198

About John I. Rees

John I. Rees is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Nephrology, Hepatology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 44 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (4 papers), Medical Imaging and Pathology Studies (4 papers), Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments (3 papers), Advanced Frequency and Time Standards (3 papers), Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (3 papers), Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (2 papers) and Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and Manual Therapy (86 citations), Hardware and Architecture (171 citations), Software (53 citations), Artificial Intelligence (337 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (165 citations). John I. Rees has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include William Clinger, Adrian Sugar, S.C. Hodder, Thomas Barry Oliver, Lynn A. Williams, Rosemary A. Barnes, Kelsey Lyons, Susan Ann Jebb, Bryan Williams and Marinos Elia. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Radiology, Nuclear Medicine Communications, British Journal of Urology, British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Lara D. Veeken.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact