John Holbrook

56 papers receiving 691 citations

Peers

John Holbrook
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Applied Mathematics 339
  • Algebra and Number Theory 127
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 302
  • Mathematical Physics 165
  • Geometry and Topology 101
Replace E. B. Saff with:
E. B. Saff United States
Mitsuru Nakai Japan
John Pym United Kingdom
Michael Shapiro Mexico
Lee Lorch Canada
Dierk Schleicher Germany
Samuel I. Goldberg United States
Yu. M. Berezansky Ukraine
Joel L. Schiff New Zealand
J. W. Neuberger United States
John Holbrook relative to E. B. Saff United States E. B. Saff's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
E. B. Saff · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Holbrook

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Holbrook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Holbrook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Holbrook more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Holbrook

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Holbrook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Holbrook. The network helps show where John Holbrook may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Holbrook, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Holbrook Line = papers co-authored together John Holbrook links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005163
2 198344
3 198039
4 198336
5 198336
6 200329
7 196928
8 200728
9 200728
10 200624
11 198823
12 199622
13 201122
14 198517
15 198817
16 198713
17 200113
18 198913
19 199213
20 200012

About John Holbrook

John Holbrook is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Applied Mathematics, Mathematical Physics, Algebra and Number Theory and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 58 papers that have together received 772 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Matrix Theory and Algorithms (28 papers), Holomorphic and Operator Theory (12 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (11 papers), Mathematical Inequalities and Applications (9 papers), Spectral Theory in Mathematical Physics (6 papers), Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (5 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (5 papers) and Advanced Operator Algebra Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Mathematics (339 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (127 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (302 citations), Mathematical Physics (165 citations) and Geometry and Topology (101 citations). John Holbrook has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Rajendra Bhatia, M. Douglas LeVan, David W. Kribs, Rajendra Bhatia, C. K. Fong, Man-Duen Choi, Karol Życzkowski, Ken Gerow, Raymond Laflamme and Kenneth R. Davidson. Their work appears in journals such as Linear Algebra and its Applications, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, Canadian Journal of Mathematics, The Michigan Mathematical Journal and Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact