John Hacker‐Wright
Impact in
- Philosophy top 2%
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Classical Philosophy and Thought
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil
- Medieval Philosophy and Theology
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
-
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Free Will and Agency
Papers in
- Philosophy 12
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 11
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 4
- Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism 1
-
- Ethics in medical practice 8
- Co-authors
- Micah Lott (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Philosophy (2 papers)Topoi (1 paper)Ratio (1 paper)The Southern Journal of Philosophy (1 paper)Ethical Theory and Moral Practice (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaGermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
John Hacker‐Wright
15 papers receiving 197 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- Philosophy 166
- Cognitive Neuroscience 90
- General Health Professions 54
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 3
- History and Philosophy of Science 9
Countries citing papers authored by John Hacker‐Wright
This map shows the geographic impact of John Hacker‐Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Hacker‐Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Hacker‐Wright more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Hacker‐Wright
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Hacker‐Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Hacker‐Wright. The network helps show where John Hacker‐Wright may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 1 scholars most cited alongside John Hacker‐Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 40 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 36 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 30 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 29 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 23 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 22 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 18 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 13 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 13 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2020 | 0 | |
| 18 | 2021 | 0 | |
| 19 | 2023 | 0 |
About John Hacker‐Wright
John Hacker‐Wright is a scholar working on Philosophy, General Health Professions, Political Science and International Relations, Cognitive Neuroscience and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 19 papers that have together received 232 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophical Ethics and Theory (11 papers), Ethics in medical practice (8 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (4 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (4 papers), Free Will and Agency (2 papers), Evolution and Science Education (1 paper), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (1 paper) and Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (166 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (90 citations), General Health Professions (54 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (3 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (9 citations). John Hacker‐Wright has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Micah Lott. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy, Topoi, Ratio, The Southern Journal of Philosophy and Ethical Theory and Moral Practice.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.