John Greene
Impact in
- Algebra and Number Theory top 5%
- Advanced Mathematical Identities
- Analytic Number Theory Research
- Geometry and Topology top 5%
- Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory
Papers in
-
- Advanced Mathematical Identities 6
- Analytic Number Theory Research 4
-
- Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory 3
- Mathematics and Applications 3
- Co-authors
- Ron Evans (5 shared papers)Ronald J. Evans (2 shared papers)Dennis Stanton (1 shared paper)Harald Niederreiter (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Transactions of the American Mathematical Society (2 papers)Finite Fields and Their Applications (1 paper)The Journal of Difference Equations and Applications (1 paper)Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society (1 paper)The Michigan Mathematical Journal (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
John Greene
16 papers receiving 237 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
- Algebra and Number Theory 169
- Geometry and Topology 134
- Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 35
- Mathematical Physics 76
- Applied Mathematics 55
Countries citing papers authored by John Greene
This map shows the geographic impact of John Greene's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Greene with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Greene more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Greene
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Greene. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Greene. The network helps show where John Greene may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside John Greene, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1987 | 115 | |
| 2 | 1987 | 32 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 19 | |
| 4 | 1987 | 17 | |
| 5 | 1992 | 17 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 14 | |
| 7 | 1986 | 11 | |
| 8 | 1993 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 4 | |
| 13 | 1991 | 3 | |
| 14 | 1991 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2003 | 2 | |
| 16 | 1997 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2020 | 0 | |
| 19 | 1997 | 0 |
About John Greene
John Greene is a scholar working on Algebra and Number Theory, Geometry and Topology, Applied Mathematics, Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 19 papers that have together received 267 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Mathematical Identities (6 papers), Mathematical functions and polynomials (5 papers), Coding theory and cryptography (5 papers), Polynomial and algebraic computation (4 papers), Analytic Number Theory Research (4 papers), graph theory and CDMA systems (3 papers), Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (3 papers) and Mathematics and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Algebra and Number Theory (169 citations), Geometry and Topology (134 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (35 citations), Mathematical Physics (76 citations) and Applied Mathematics (55 citations). John Greene has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Ron Evans, Ronald J. Evans, Dennis Stanton and Harald Niederreiter. Their work appears in journals such as Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, Finite Fields and Their Applications, The Journal of Difference Equations and Applications, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society and The Michigan Mathematical Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.