Countries where authors publish in Aequationes Mathematicae
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Aequationes Mathematicae. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Aequationes Mathematicae with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Aequationes Mathematicae more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Aequationes Mathematicae
This network shows the impact of papers published in Aequationes Mathematicae. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Aequationes Mathematicae.
About Aequationes Mathematicae
The 2.9k papers published in Aequationes Mathematicae in the last decades have received a total of 25.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Aequationes Mathematicae usually cover Applied Mathematics (1.5k papers), Algebra and Number Theory (428 papers), Geometry and Topology (791 papers), Mathematical Physics (656 papers) and Theoretical Computer Science (81 papers) specifically the topics of Functional Equations Stability Results (1.1k papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (296 papers), Mathematics and Applications (270 papers), Mathematical and Theoretical Analysis (209 papers), graph theory and CDMA systems (181 papers), Mathematical Inequalities and Applications (154 papers), Matrix Theory and Algorithms (154 papers) and Optimization and Variational Analysis (135 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Aequationes Mathematicae are Michael Frank, Bruno Buchberger, Gian Luigi Forti, Henrik Stetkær, Philippe G. Ciarlet, Jürg Rätz, J. Aczél, Zenon Moszner, Janusz Brzdȩk and Lech Maligranda.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.