John Frederick
Impact in
-
- Health disparities and outcomes
Papers in
-
- Healthcare cost, quality, practices 2
- Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare 1
- Primary Care and Health Outcomes 1
- Health and Wellbeing Research 1
-
- Influenza Virus Research Studies 1
- Co-authors
- John Shepard (2 shared papers)Eric Hadhazy (2 shared papers)Trish M. Perl (2 shared papers)Aaron M. Milstone (1 shared paper)Mark Snowden (1 shared paper)James P. LoGerfo (1 shared paper)Barbara Williams (1 shared paper)Elizabeth A. Phelan (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Open Forum Infectious Diseases (1 paper)American Journal of Infection Control (1 paper)Oceanography (1 paper)JAMA Surgery (1 paper)BMC Family Practice (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesJapan
In The Last Decade
John Frederick
5 papers receiving 339 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 13
- Health 40
- Surgery 142
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 16
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 68
Countries citing papers authored by John Frederick
This map shows the geographic impact of John Frederick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Frederick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Frederick more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Frederick
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Frederick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Frederick. The network helps show where John Frederick may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 24 scholars most cited alongside John Frederick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 176 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 153 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 13 | |
| 4 | Making quality measurement work. | 2003 | 11 |
| 5 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 0 |
About John Frederick
John Frederick is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Epidemiology, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Pharmacology, having authored 6 papers that have together received 354 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare cost, quality, practices (2 papers), Infection Control and Ventilation (1 paper), Influenza Virus Research Studies (1 paper), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (1 paper), COVID-19 epidemiological studies (1 paper), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (1 paper), Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies (1 paper) and Health and Wellbeing Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (13 citations), Health (40 citations), Surgery (142 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (16 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (68 citations). John Frederick has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include John Shepard, Eric Hadhazy, Trish M. Perl, Aaron M. Milstone, Mark Snowden, James P. LoGerfo, Barbara Williams, Elizabeth A. Phelan, Frances Wong and Lucy S. Tompkins. Their work appears in journals such as Open Forum Infectious Diseases, American Journal of Infection Control, Oceanography, JAMA Surgery and BMC Family Practice.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.