John Foster

6.7k citations
219 papers · 3.8k · h-index 29

Impact in

Papers in

John Foster

188 papers receiving 3.3k citations

Peers

John Foster
Comparison fields: 5 of 178
  • General Energy 92
  • Economics and Econometrics 1.4k
  • Business and International Management 72
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 288
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 219
Replace Amory B. Lovins with:
Amory B. Lovins United States
Thomas P. Hughes United States
Jérémy Rifkin United States
Jørgen Randers Norway
David J. Hess United States
Dennis L. Meadows United States
Yuya Kajikawa Japan
Joseph P. Martino United States
Richard G. Newell United States
Harro van Lente Netherlands
John Foster relative to Amory B. Lovins United States Amory B. Lovins's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.6×
Amory B. Lovins · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Foster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Foster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Foster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Foster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Foster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Foster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Foster. The network helps show where John Foster may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Foster, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Foster Line = papers co-authored together John Foster links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 219 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004461
2 2013208
3 2011189
4 2005172
5 2005150
6 2016106
7 2012102
8 1997100
9 201095
10 200275
11 200173
12 201769
13 201665
14 201162
15 199356
16 201656
17 200054
18 200448
19 200046
20 200142

About John Foster

John Foster is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 219 papers that have together received 3.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic theories and models (33 papers), Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis (26 papers), Irish and British Studies (22 papers), Economic Theory and Institutions (16 papers), Electric Power System Optimization (14 papers), Integrated Energy Systems Optimization (10 papers), Global Energy and Sustainability Research (9 papers) and Energy Load and Power Forecasting (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Energy (92 citations), Economics and Econometrics (1.4k citations), Business and International Management (72 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (288 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (219 citations). John Foster has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jason Potts, Kurt Dopfer, Liam Wagner, J. S. Metcalfe, Colin G. Brown, Lynette Molyneaux, Phillip Wild, Stan Metcalfe, Ronnie Ramlogan and Mark Dodgson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Evolutionary Economics, The Economic Journal, The Energy Journal, Cambridge Journal of Economics and Environmental Education Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact