John Fielder

42 papers receiving 401 citations

Peers

John Fielder
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Health 73
  • Pharmacy 33
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 9
  • General Health Professions 141
  • Medical Terminology 1
Replace Albert Felling with:
Albert Felling Netherlands
William F. May United States
Melinda Krakow United States
Scheltus J. van Luijk Netherlands
Belinda Lunnay Australia
Jessica Mesman Netherlands
Samantha Nazione United States
J.A. Walburg Netherlands
Rebecca Flournoy United States
Shelagh K. Genuis Canada
John Fielder relative to Albert Felling Netherlands Albert Felling's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Albert Felling · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Fielder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Fielder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Fielder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Fielder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Fielder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Fielder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Fielder. The network helps show where John Fielder may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside John Fielder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Fielder Line = papers co-authored together John Fielder links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996124
2 200698
3
Achieving better peer interaction in online discussion forums: A reflective practitioner case study
201349
4 200236
5 199129
6
The Dc-10 Case: A Study in Applied Ethics, Technology, and Society
199219
7 199314
8 197911
9 199210
10 19958
11 19938
12 19758
13 20047
14 19917
15 19915
16 19954
17 20054
18 19924
19
Dr. Death
19983
20 19813

About John Fielder

John Fielder is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Economics and Econometrics, Pharmacology and Physiology, having authored 53 papers that have together received 500 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in medical practice (9 papers), Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare (5 papers), Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (5 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (5 papers), Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights (4 papers), Biomedical and Engineering Education (4 papers), Ethics in Business and Education (3 papers) and Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (73 citations), Pharmacy (33 citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (9 citations), General Health Professions (141 citations) and Medical Terminology (1 citation). John Fielder has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Pat Dudgeon, Jianhong Xia, Patricia A. Lawler, Bas A.J.M. de Mol, Michelle Webb, Michael Wright, Anne‐Marie Eades, Cheryl Davis and Kath Peters. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, The Hastings Center Report, Business and Professional Ethics Journal, The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education and Research in Nursing & Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact