John Field

65 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

John Field
Comparison fields: 5 of 140
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 70
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 251
  • Education 391
  • Environmental Engineering 175
  • Biomedical Engineering 516
Replace Geert Woltjer with:
Geert Woltjer Netherlands
Francisco J. Lozano Mexico
Natasha Gilbert United States
Patrícia Osseweijer Netherlands
Gisbert Glaser Australia
Deborah O’Connell Australia
Kathleen E. Halvorsen United States
Suvi Huttunen Finland
Genovaitė Liobikienė Lithuania
Sujatha Raman United Kingdom
John Field relative to Geert Woltjer Netherlands Geert Woltjer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Geert Woltjer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Field

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Field's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Field with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Field more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Field

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Field. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Field. The network helps show where John Field may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Field, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Field Line = papers co-authored together John Field links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013221
2 2020138
3 2012127
4 2001125
5 2000102
6 201796
7 202186
8 201279
9 200069
10 200459
11 201854
12
European Dimensions: Education, Training and the European Union
199751
13 200339
14 201532
15 199431
16
Informal learning and social capital
200031
17 202130
18 201828
19 202226
20 199326

About John Field

John Field is a scholar working on Education, Sociology and Political Science, Agronomy and Crop Science, Biomedical Engineering and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 69 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bioenergy crop production and management (15 papers), Biofuel production and bioconversion (14 papers), Education Systems and Policy (10 papers), Higher Education Learning Practices (9 papers), Global Educational Policies and Reforms (9 papers), Youth Education and Societal Dynamics (7 papers), Forest Biomass Utilization and Management (7 papers) and Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human Factors and Ergonomics (70 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (251 citations), Education (391 citations), Environmental Engineering (175 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (516 citations). John Field has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Morgan DeFoort, Paul Tanger, Tom Schuller, Keith Paustian, Jan E. Leach, Courtney E. Jahn, Stephen Baron, M. Francesca Cotrufo, Catherine Keske and Pete Smith. Their work appears in journals such as GCB Bioenergy, International Journal of Lifelong Education, Journal of Social History, Frontiers in Energy Research and Journal of Further and Higher Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact