John Farley

94 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers

John Farley
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
  • Reproductive Medicine 1.1k
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 794
  • Oncology 888
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 382
  • Cancer Research 318
Replace Anne‐Sophie Bats with:
Anne‐Sophie Bats France
Jacek Gronwald Poland
Jose Alejandro Rauh‐Hain United States
Petra L.M. Zusterzeel Netherlands
Linda Duska United States
Keiichiro Nakamura Japan
Chun‐Ju Chiang Taiwan
Victor R. Grann United States
Susan C. Modesitt United States
Jubilee Brown United States
John Farley relative to Anne‐Sophie Bats France Anne‐Sophie Bats's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Anne‐Sophie Bats · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Farley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Farley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Farley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Farley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Farley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Farley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Farley. The network helps show where John Farley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Farley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Farley Line = papers co-authored together John Farley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 97 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012276
2 2014178
3 2013153
4 2010141
5 2003101
6 2017101
7 201491
8
Cyclin E expression is a significant predictor of survival in advanced, suboptimally debulked ovarian epithelial cancers: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.
200389
9 200177
10 200868
11 201166
12 200764
13 201762
14 200859
15
Abnormal Fhit expression in malignant and premalignant lesions of the cervix.
199954
16 201450
17 200947
18 201146
19 201844
20 201440

About John Farley

John Farley is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Oncology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Epidemiology and Cancer Research, having authored 97 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (41 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (29 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (17 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (8 papers), Cancer Mechanisms and Therapy (8 papers), Renal cell carcinoma treatment (7 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (7 papers) and Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (1.1k citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (794 citations), Oncology (888 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (382 citations) and Cancer Research (318 citations). John Farley has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Michael J. Birrer, G. Scott Rose, G. Larry Maxwell, David M. Gershenson, William E. Brady, Heather A. Lankes, Kate Oliver, David G. Mutch, Eloise Chapman‐Davis and Robert R. Taylor. Their work appears in journals such as Gynecologic Oncology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Cancer, Obstetrics and Gynecology and International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact