John Farley

94 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Peers

John Farley
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Reproductive Medicine 916
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 620
  • Oncology 679
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 293
  • Cancer Research 229
Replace Anne‐Sophie Bats with:
Anne‐Sophie Bats France
Jacek Gronwald Poland
Petra L.M. Zusterzeel Netherlands
Keiichiro Nakamura Japan
Mats G. Karlsson Sweden
Chun‐Ju Chiang Taiwan
Jose Alejandro Rauh‐Hain United States
Nachimuthu Natarajan United States
Mark F. Wildhagen Netherlands
Robert Spirtas United States
John Farley relative to Anne‐Sophie Bats France Anne‐Sophie Bats's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Anne‐Sophie Bats · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Farley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Farley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Farley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Farley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Farley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Farley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Farley. The network helps show where John Farley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Farley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Farley Line = papers co-authored together John Farley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 98 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012290
2 2014185
3 2013165
4 2010145
5 2017107
6 2003106
7 201493
8
Cyclin E expression is a significant predictor of survival in advanced, suboptimally debulked ovarian epithelial cancers: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.
200391
9 200179
10 200874
11 201172
12 201768
13 200767
14 200859
15 201456
16
Abnormal Fhit expression in malignant and premalignant lesions of the cervix.
199955
17 200949
18 201849
19 201148
20 201144

About John Farley

John Farley is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Oncology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Molecular Biology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 98 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (33 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (20 papers), Cancer Mechanisms and Therapy (6 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (6 papers), Renal cell carcinoma treatment (5 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (5 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers) and Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (916 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (620 citations), Oncology (679 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (293 citations) and Cancer Research (229 citations). John Farley has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Michael J. Birrer, G. Scott Rose, G. Larry Maxwell, David M. Gershenson, William E. Brady, Heather A. Lankes, Kate Oliver, Robert R. Taylor, David G. Mutch and Eloise Chapman‐Davis. Their work appears in journals such as Gynecologic Oncology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Cancer, Obstetrics and Gynecology and International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact