John Elsner

24 papers receiving 336 citations

Peers

John Elsner
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Geography, Planning and Development 143
  • Anthropology 255
  • Classics 79
  • Archeology 166
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 44
Replace Randolph Starn with:
Randolph Starn United States
Hans G. Kippenberg Germany
Mary Baine Campbell United States
Bernhard W. Scholz United States
Richard Jenkyns United Kingdom
Charles Forsdick United Kingdom
Roderick Beaton United Kingdom
Georges Dumézil France
Alastair Hamilton United States
S. Brent Plate United States
John Elsner relative to Randolph Starn United States Randolph Starn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
Randolph Starn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Elsner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Elsner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Elsner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Elsner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Elsner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Elsner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Elsner. The network helps show where John Elsner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside John Elsner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Elsner Line = papers co-authored together John Elsner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997124
2 199281
3 199158
4 199650
5
The Cultures of Collecting
201146
6
Pilgrimage : past and present : sacred travel and sacred space in the world religions
199541
7 200331
8 199726
9 199422
10 199415
11 19949
12 19909
13
Reviewing Pygmalion. -Visual mimesis and the myth of the real: Ovid's Pygmalion as viewer; and the love of creation including the story of Myrrha-
19918
14 19888
15 20098
16 20108
17 20047
18 19977
19 20025
20 19952

About John Elsner

John Elsner is a scholar working on Anthropology, Geography, Planning and Development, Archeology, History and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 25 papers that have together received 571 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religious Tourism and Spaces (10 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (7 papers), Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (6 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (3 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (3 papers), Christian Theology and Mission (2 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (2 papers) and Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (143 citations), Anthropology (255 citations), Classics (79 citations), Archeology (166 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (44 citations). John Elsner has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Simon Coleman, Julia Clancy‐Smith, Roger Cardinal, Whitney Davis, Alison Sharrock, Ian Rutherford, Douglas Crimp, Daniel J. Sherman and Irit Rogoff. Their work appears in journals such as The Art Bulletin, Art History, History and Anthropology, Classical Receptions Journal and The Journal of Hellenic Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact