John Elsner

24 papers receiving 316 citations

Peers

John Elsner
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Geography, Planning and Development 139
  • Anthropology 212
  • Classics 41
  • Archeology 61
  • Museology 22
Replace Bernhard Walter Scholz with:
Bernhard Walter Scholz United States
Richard Jenkyns United Kingdom
Kathryn Rountree New Zealand
S. Brent Plate United States
Margaret T. Hodgen
Patricia Tamara Alleyne-Dettmers
Catharine Edwards United Kingdom
Georges Dumézil France
PETER JAN MARGRY Netherlands
Volkhard Krech Germany
John Elsner relative to Bernhard Walter Scholz United States Bernhard Walter Scholz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.7×
Bernhard Walter Scholz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Elsner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Elsner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Elsner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Elsner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Elsner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Elsner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Elsner. The network helps show where John Elsner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside John Elsner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Elsner Line = papers co-authored together John Elsner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997117
2 199285
3 199155
4 199649
5
The Cultures of Collecting
201140
6
Pilgrimage : past and present : sacred travel and sacred space in the world religions
199539
7
Pilgrim Voices: Narrative and Authorship in Christian Pilgrimage
200331
8 199725
9 199422
10 199416
11 19889
12 19949
13 19908
14
Reviewing Pygmalion. -Visual mimesis and the myth of the real: Ovid's Pygmalion as viewer; and the love of creation including the story of Myrrha-
19918
15 19978
16 20108
17 20047
18 20025
19 20095
20 19952

About John Elsner

John Elsner is a scholar working on Geography, Planning and Development, Anthropology, Classics, Museology and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 25 papers that have together received 554 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religious Tourism and Spaces (9 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (9 papers), Medieval Literature and History (3 papers), Visual Culture and Art Theory (3 papers), Libraries and Information Services (3 papers), Historical Art and Architecture Studies (2 papers), Museums and Cultural Heritage (2 papers) and Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (139 citations), Anthropology (212 citations), Classics (41 citations), Archeology (61 citations) and Museology (22 citations). John Elsner has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Simon Coleman, Julia Ann Clancy-Smith, Roger Cardinal, Whitney M. Davis, Alison Sharrock, Ian Rutherford, Ivan Gaskell, Irit Rogoff, Douglas Crimp and Daniel J. Sherman. Their work appears in journals such as The Art Bulletin, Art History, The Journal of Hellenic Studies, Ramus and The Classical Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact