Classical Receptions Journal

206 papers and 236 indexed citations i.

About

The 206 papers published in Classical Receptions Journal in the last decades have received a total of 236 indexed citations. Papers published in Classical Receptions Journal usually cover Anthropology (78 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (74 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (62 papers) specifically the topics of Classical Antiquity Studies (47 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (27 papers) and Historical and Literary Studies (20 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Classical Receptions Journal are Charles Martindale, Emily Greenwood, J. Todd Billings, Sarah Annes Brown, Constanze Güthenke, Robert S Miola, S. Sara Monoson, Sabine MacCormack, Jeff W. Atkins and Edith Hall.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Classical Receptions Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Classical Receptions Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Classical Receptions Journal.

Countries where authors publish in Classical Receptions Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Classical Receptions Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Classical Receptions Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Classical Receptions Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025