John E. Petersen

32 papers receiving 951 citations

Peers

John E. Petersen
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 241
  • Environmental Chemistry 135
  • Oceanography 163
  • Building and Construction 153
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 130
Replace Tânia Sousa with:
Tânia Sousa Portugal
Kun Song China
S.W.K. van den Burg Netherlands
Michelle Ε. Portman Israel
Monika Zurek United Kingdom
Silvia Ferrini United Kingdom
Russell Richards Australia
Johanna Alkan Olsson Sweden
Ryo Kohsaka Japan
Areti Kontogianni Greece
John E. Petersen relative to Tânia Sousa Portugal Tânia Sousa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Tânia Sousa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John E. Petersen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Petersen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Petersen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Petersen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John E. Petersen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Petersen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Petersen. The network helps show where John E. Petersen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John E. Petersen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John E. Petersen Line = papers co-authored together John E. Petersen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007306
2 2003160
3 199793
4 199979
5 200353
6 200145
7 200938
8 201537
9 200535
10 201534
11 201729
12 200325
13 197717
14 199712
15 199211
16 201510
17 20159
18 19988
19 20187
20
DOES PROVIDING DORMITORY RESIDENTS WITH FEEDBACK ON ENERGY AND WATER USE LEAD TO REDUCED CONSUMPTION
20056

About John E. Petersen

John E. Petersen is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Economics and Econometrics, Ecology and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 40 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Environmental Education and Sustainability (8 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (6 papers), Local Government Finance and Decentralization (5 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (5 papers), Climate Change Communication and Perception (5 papers), Marine and coastal ecosystems (4 papers), Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (4 papers) and Complex Systems and Decision Making (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (241 citations), Environmental Chemistry (135 citations), Oceanography (163 citations), Building and Construction (153 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (130 citations). John E. Petersen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Kate R. Weinberger, Kathryn B. Janda, W. Michael Kemp, Chung‐Chi Chen, Jeffrey C. Cornwell, Alan Hastings, T. Madsen, Christian Grøn, Søren O. Petersen and Kristian K. Brandt. Their work appears in journals such as National Tax Journal, PLoS ONE, Oikos, Systems Research and Behavioral Science and Ecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact