John E. Pérez

1.4k citations
20 papers · 1.1k · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

John E. Pérez

20 papers receiving 963 citations

Peers

John E. Pérez
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Health 318
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 199
  • Clinical Psychology 223
  • Applied Psychology 43
  • Social Psychology 121
Replace Kimberly S. Bowen with:
Kimberly S. Bowen United States
Brenda E. Hogan Canada
James P. Choca United States
Angelo M. DiBello United States
Helen Mildred Australia
Ruixue Zhaoyang United States
Dominic Beaulieu‐Prévost Canada
Teresa E. Woods United States
Raphaël Trouillet France
Melissa R. Schick United States
John E. Pérez relative to Kimberly S. Bowen United States Kimberly S. Bowen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.1×
Kimberly S. Bowen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John E. Pérez

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Pérez's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Pérez with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Pérez more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John E. Pérez

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Pérez. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Pérez. The network helps show where John E. Pérez may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John E. Pérez, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John E. Pérez Line = papers co-authored together John E. Pérez links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2000351
2 2006179
3 2003140
4 201365
5 201251
6 201144
7 200842
8 201141
9 200336
10 200934
11 201432
12 199915
13 201215
14 20069
15 20008
16 20098
17 19997
18 20087
19 20172
20
Religiousness, Coping, and Social Support Predict Well-Being among Cancer Patients
20161

About John E. Pérez

John E. Pérez is a scholar working on Health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Cultural Studies, having authored 20 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (11 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Social Skills and Education (2 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (1 paper), Schizophrenia research and treatment (1 paper), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (1 paper) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health (318 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (199 citations), Clinical Psychology (223 citations), Applied Psychology (43 citations) and Social Psychology (121 citations). John E. Pérez has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Mark A. Whisman, Wiveka Ramel, Todd D. Little, Michelle Pearce, Ricardo F. Muñoz, Jacqueline L. Stoddard, Kevin Delucchi, Leslie Andrew Lenert, Elíseo J. Pérez-Stable and Carlos Penilla. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Behavioral Medicine, American Journal of Community Psychology, American Psychologist, Personality and Individual Differences and Ethos.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact