John E. Loftis
Impact in
-
- Literature: history, themes, analysis
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
- Museology top 2%
- Historical Art and Culture Studies
Papers in
-
- Philippine History and Culture 6
-
- Early Modern Spanish Literature 4
- Literature: history, themes, analysis 2
- Co-authors
- Alexander Welsh (1 shared paper)Claude Rawson (1 shared paper)Arthur H. Scouten (3 shared papers)Richard W. Southern (3 shared papers)Marion G. Jones (3 shared papers)Robert D. Hume (1 shared paper)Betty A. Schellenberg (1 shared paper)John Holmes McDowell (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- MLN (4 papers)Eighteenth-Century Studies (3 papers)The Modern Language Review (2 papers)Comparative Literature (2 papers)Neophilologus (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
John E. Loftis
16 papers receiving 79 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Literature and Literary Theory 152
- Museology 46
- History 89
- Music 24
- Classics 29
Countries citing papers authored by John E. Loftis
This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Loftis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Loftis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Loftis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John E. Loftis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Loftis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Loftis. The network helps show where John E. Loftis may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 13 scholars most cited alongside John E. Loftis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1977 | 91 | |
| 2 | 1993 | 52 | |
| 3 | 1964 | 43 | |
| 4 | 1989 | 20 | |
| 5 | 1960 | 18 | |
| 6 | 1961 | 18 | |
| 7 | 1998 | 15 | |
| 8 | 1975 | 12 | |
| 9 | 1959 | 8 | |
| 10 | 1982 | 3 | |
| 11 | The Theatre, 1720 | 1962 | 3 |
| 12 | 1959 | 3 | |
| 13 | 1955 | 3 | |
| 14 | 1984 | 3 | |
| 15 | 1953 | 3 | |
| 16 | Trials and the Shaping of Identity in Tom Jones | 2002 | 2 |
| 17 | 1982 | 2 | |
| 18 | 1996 | 2 | |
| 19 | 1955 | 1 | |
| 20 | Amplification of Shock Overpressure by Reflection within Concave Corners | 1993 | 1 |
About John E. Loftis
John E. Loftis is a scholar working on Anthropology, Literature and Literary Theory, History, Museology and Music, having authored 33 papers that have together received 311 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philippine History and Culture (6 papers), Early Modern Spanish Literature (4 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (4 papers), Historical Art and Culture Studies (3 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (2 papers), Theater, Performance, and Music History (2 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (2 papers) and Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (152 citations), Museology (46 citations), History (89 citations), Music (24 citations) and Classics (29 citations). John E. Loftis has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Alexander Welsh, Claude Rawson, Arthur H. Scouten, Richard W. Southern, Marion G. Jones, Robert D. Hume, Betty A. Schellenberg, John Holmes McDowell, Richard D. Steele and David Kaufmann. Their work appears in journals such as MLN, Eighteenth-Century Studies, The Modern Language Review, Comparative Literature and Neophilologus.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.