Malcolm Kelsall

757 citations
47 papers · 295 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Malcolm Kelsall

34 papers receiving 180 citations

Peers

Malcolm Kelsall
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Literature and Literary Theory 152
  • Museology 34
  • History 81
  • Anthropology 71
  • Classics 21
Replace Lawrence Lipking with:
Lawrence Lipking United States
P. N. Furbank United Kingdom
Linda Woodbridge United States
John Loftis United States
Rudolph P. Almasy United States
Howard Erskine‐Hill United Kingdom
Patrick Cheney United States
Irvin Ehrenpreis United States
Elizabeth Sauer Canada
Colin Burrow United States
Malcolm Kelsall relative to Lawrence Lipking United States Lawrence Lipking's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Lawrence Lipking · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Malcolm Kelsall

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Malcolm Kelsall's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Malcolm Kelsall with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Malcolm Kelsall more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Malcolm Kelsall

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Malcolm Kelsall. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Malcolm Kelsall. The network helps show where Malcolm Kelsall may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Malcolm Kelsall, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Malcolm Kelsall Line = papers co-authored together Malcolm Kelsall links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197135
2 200134
3 200123
4 199223
5 199720
6
Romantic Genius and the Literary Magazine: Biography, Celebrity, Politics
200616
7 200715
8 199115
9
Byron's Politics
198714
10 200014
11
Love for Love
19709
12 20037
13 19996
14 20005
15 19985
16 19835
17 19814
18
Byron, Sully, and the Power of Portraiture
20064
19 20044
20 20033

About Malcolm Kelsall

Malcolm Kelsall is a scholar working on History, Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, Museology and Anthropology, having authored 47 papers that have together received 295 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Art and Culture Studies (5 papers), Irish and British Studies (4 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (4 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (3 papers), Philippine History and Culture (3 papers), Renaissance Literature and Culture (3 papers), European Political History Analysis (2 papers) and Theater, Performance, and Music History (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (152 citations), Museology (34 citations), History (81 citations), Anthropology (71 citations) and Classics (21 citations). Malcolm Kelsall has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Paulina Kewes, Robert D. Hume, Simon Bainbridge, Angus Calder, Sarah Fielding, Peter Faulkner, William Godwin, Suvir Kaul, David McCracken and Howard Erskine‐Hill. Their work appears in journals such as The Modern Language Review, Essays in Criticism, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, Studies in Romanticism and Huntington Library Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact