John E. Limber

577 citations
16 papers · 462 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

John E. Limber

14 papers receiving 380 citations

Peers

John E. Limber
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 280
  • Language and Linguistics 128
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 125
  • Linguistics and Language 45
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 152
Replace Nancy N. Soja with:
Nancy N. Soja United States
Hans Strohner Germany
Eric Wanner United States
Edward H. Matthei United States
Joan L. Prentice United States
William Orr Dingwall United States
Lynn M. Santelmann United States
Bart Hollebrandse Netherlands
Harris B. Savin United States
David T. Hakes United States
John E. Limber relative to Nancy N. Soja United States Nancy N. Soja's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Nancy N. Soja · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John E. Limber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Limber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Limber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Limber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John E. Limber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Limber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Limber. The network helps show where John E. Limber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside John E. Limber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John E. Limber Line = papers co-authored together John E. Limber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 1973157
2 200199
3 197766
4 197833
5 198033
6 197626
7 200926
8 198312
9 19873
10 19902
11
Syntactic structures in a corpus of non-standard English
19702
12
Semantic Characteristics of English Adjectives Determined by Their Usage
19691
13 19781
14 20001
15 19770
16 19900

About John E. Limber

John E. Limber is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Linguistics and Language, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Cultural Studies, having authored 16 papers that have together received 462 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Language and cultural evolution (2 papers), Language Development and Disorders (2 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (2 papers), Multilingual Education and Policy (2 papers), Linguistics and Cultural Studies (2 papers), Lexicography and Language Studies (1 paper), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (1 paper) and Child and Animal Learning Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (280 citations), Language and Linguistics (128 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (125 citations), Linguistics and Language (45 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (152 citations). John E. Limber has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Anne E. Cook and Edward J. O’Brien. Their work appears in journals such as Behavioral and Brain Sciences, American Psychologist, Journal of Child Language, Literacy Research and Instruction and Journal of Memory and Language.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact