John E. Bishop
Impact in
- Ophthalmology top 10%
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders
-
- Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
Papers in
-
- Synthesis and Reactivity of Sulfur-Containing Compounds 2
- Synthesis and biological activity 1
-
- Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry 6
- Co-authors
- Henry Rapoport (8 shared papers)Alexander N. Glazer (5 shared papers)Alan V. Klotz (5 shared papers)John F. O’Connell (3 shared papers)Jon O. Nagy (4 shared papers)John M. Gerdes (4 shared papers)Chester A. Mathis (4 shared papers)Paul Füglistaller (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Biological Chemistry (4 papers)The Journal of Organic Chemistry (3 papers)Journal of the American Chemical Society (2 papers)Journal of Medicinal Chemistry (1 paper)Survey of Ophthalmology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
John E. Bishop
14 papers receiving 396 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- Ophthalmology 56
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 72
- Organic Chemistry 93
- Molecular Biology 178
- Materials Chemistry 107
Countries citing papers authored by John E. Bishop
This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Bishop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Bishop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Bishop more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John E. Bishop
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Bishop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Bishop. The network helps show where John E. Bishop may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 17 scholars most cited alongside John E. Bishop, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1987 | 69 | |
| 2 | 2002 | 67 | |
| 3 | 1991 | 46 | |
| 4 | 1985 | 45 | |
| 5 | 1991 | 39 | |
| 6 | 1986 | 30 | |
| 7 | 1991 | 30 | |
| 8 | 1988 | 23 | |
| 9 | 1995 | 20 | |
| 10 | 1986 | 19 | |
| 11 | 1989 | 14 | |
| 12 | 1992 | 9 | |
| 13 | 1991 | 7 | |
| 14 | Synthesis of aryl-substituted 5-[18F]fluoroalkylbenzamides: High affinity ligands for dopamine D-2 studies | 1991 | 4 |
About John E. Bishop
John E. Bishop is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Materials Chemistry, Pharmaceutical Science, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Molecular Biology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 422 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry (6 papers), Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (4 papers), Fluorine in Organic Chemistry (2 papers), Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (2 papers), Synthesis and Reactivity of Sulfur-Containing Compounds (2 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (1 paper), Synthesis and biological activity (1 paper) and Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (56 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (72 citations), Organic Chemistry (93 citations), Molecular Biology (178 citations) and Materials Chemistry (107 citations). John E. Bishop has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Henry Rapoport, Alexander N. Glazer, Alan V. Klotz, John F. O’Connell, Jon O. Nagy, John M. Gerdes, Chester A. Mathis, Paul Füglistaller, Herbert Zuber and John Clark Lagarias. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, The Journal of Organic Chemistry, Journal of the American Chemical Society, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry and Survey of Ophthalmology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.