John E. Beauvais

25 papers receiving 1k citations

Peers

John E. Beauvais
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Family Practice 98
  • General Decision Sciences 99
  • Leadership and Management 30
  • Applied Psychology 73
  • Research and Theory 26
Replace Ian P. Albery with:
Ian P. Albery United Kingdom
Renee E. Magnan United States
Gary King United States
Stephen G. Schneider United States
Eric W. Corty United States
Yim Wah Mak Hong Kong
Bruce W. Carlson United States
Marvin W. Acklin United States
Judith Pizarro United States
Linda Richter United States
John E. Beauvais relative to Ian P. Albery United Kingdom Ian P. Albery's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×
Ian P. Albery · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John E. Beauvais

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Beauvais's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Beauvais with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Beauvais more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John E. Beauvais

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Beauvais. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Beauvais. The network helps show where John E. Beauvais may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John E. Beauvais, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John E. Beauvais Line = papers co-authored together John E. Beauvais links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995286
2 2013206
3 2000192
4 200456
5 199554
6 200349
7 200942
8 201929
9 200123
10 200423
11 201921
12 200520
13 199119
14 201916
15 201411
16 201911
17 20177
18 20045
19 20195
20 20193

About John E. Beauvais

John E. Beauvais is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Family Practice, Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 25 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (6 papers), Historical and Modern Theater Studies (4 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (4 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (3 papers), Medication Adherence and Compliance (3 papers), Psychological Testing and Assessment (3 papers), Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization (2 papers) and Counseling Practices and Supervision (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (98 citations), General Decision Sciences (99 citations), Leadership and Management (30 citations), Applied Psychology (73 citations) and Research and Theory (26 citations). John E. Beauvais has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Audrey Marie Beauvais, Anne E. Moyer, Peter Salovey, Susan DeNisco, Julie G. Stewart, Alexander J. Rothman, Sara M. Banks, Elissa S. Epel, Marc I. Rosen and Michael O. Rigsby. Their work appears in journals such as Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders, Rehabilitation Psychology, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology and Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact