John Denham

427 citations
32 papers · 201 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

John Denham

28 papers receiving 146 citations

Peers

John Denham
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 82
  • Medical Terminology 1
  • Clinical Psychology 37
  • Philosophy 18
  • Biological Psychiatry 3
Replace Tom Lutz with:
Tom Lutz United States
Norman Gevitz United States
Roy Porter United Kingdom
Philip Timms United Kingdom
S. G. Post United States
Bruce M. Z. Cohen New Zealand
Dinesh Arya Australia
Lisa Gadon United Kingdom
Craig G. Johnson United States
Gerard Lynch Ireland
John Denham relative to Tom Lutz United States Tom Lutz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Tom Lutz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Denham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Denham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Denham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Denham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Denham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Denham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Denham. The network helps show where John Denham may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside John Denham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Denham Line = papers co-authored together John Denham links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197147
2 196127
3 195919
4 202016
5
THE INDUSTRIAL REHABILITATION OF LONG-STAY SCHIZOPHRENIC PATIENTS. A STUDY OF 45 PATIENTS AT AN INDUSTRIAL REHABILITATION UNIT.
196410
6 196110
7
Expans'd hieroglyphicks : a critical edition of Sir John Denham's Coopers Hill
19699
8 19638
9 19607
10 19735
11
The implications of extrapyramidal symptoms in the treatment of schizophrenia.
19615
12 20234
13 19704
14 20234
15 19584
16 19604
17 20163
18 20013
19 20242
20 19712

About John Denham

John Denham is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Psychiatry and Mental health, Molecular Biology, Sociology and Political Science and Organic Chemistry, having authored 32 papers that have together received 201 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phenothiazines and Benzothiazines Synthesis and Activities (4 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (3 papers), Political Systems and Governance (3 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers), Political and Economic history of UK and US (3 papers), Irish and British Studies (2 papers), Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (2 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (82 citations), Medical Terminology (1 citation), Clinical Psychology (37 citations), Philosophy (18 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (3 citations). John Denham has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Pakistan. Frequent co-authors include J. K. Wing, Janice Morphet, Patricia Ndugga, John Boswell, Lawrence McKay, Matt Ryan, Richard Brooks, Daniel Devine, M. M. Glatt and Tim Oliver. Their work appears in journals such as The Political Quarterly, Local Economy The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit, The Lancet, Journal of Hospital Infection and Representation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact