John D. Wirth

790 citations
42 papers · 436 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

John D. Wirth

33 papers receiving 312 citations

Peers

John D. Wirth
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Development 34
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 61
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 29
  • Anthropology 58
  • Political Science and International Relations 112
Replace E. Bradford Burns with:
E. Bradford Burns United States
Colin M. Lewis United Kingdom
Linda B. Hall United States
Richard J. Salvucci United States
Carl Solberg United States
Utsa Patnaik India
Carlos Marichal Mexico
John Womack United States
Julius E. Nyang’oro United States
Friedrich Katz United States
John D. Wirth relative to E. Bradford Burns United States E. Bradford Burns's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
E. Bradford Burns · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John D. Wirth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John D. Wirth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John D. Wirth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John D. Wirth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John D. Wirth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John D. Wirth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John D. Wirth. The network helps show where John D. Wirth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside John D. Wirth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John D. Wirth Line = papers co-authored together John D. Wirth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197752
2 198449
3 198526
4 198826
5 197825
6 197025
7 200122
8 199521
9 196917
10 198617
11 197315
12 196914
13 199613
14 197112
15 199311
16 199610
17 19709
18 19959
19
Environmental management on North America's borders
19988
20 19778

About John D. Wirth

John D. Wirth is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Anthropology and Urban Studies, having authored 42 papers that have together received 436 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Brazilian History and Foreign Policy (8 papers), Brazilian cultural history and politics (3 papers), History of Colonial Brazil (3 papers), Public Policy and Governance (2 papers), American Environmental and Regional History (2 papers), Cultural, Media, and Literary Studies (2 papers), Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies (2 papers) and Urban Development and Societal Issues (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (34 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (61 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (29 citations), Anthropology (58 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (112 citations). John D. Wirth has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Warren Dean, Riordan Roett, Richard Graham, George A. Collier, Renato Rosaldo, Benjamin Keen, Donald K. Emmerson, Gary W. Wynia, Robert M. Levine and José Carlos Sebe Bom Meihy. Their work appears in journals such as Hispanic American Historical Review, The American Historical Review, Geographical Review, Environmental History and Foreign Affairs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact