John Womack

31 papers receiving 274 citations

Peers

John Womack
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Cultural Studies 106
  • Political Science and International Relations 293
  • Anthropology 112
  • Development 24
  • Sociology and Political Science 285
Replace James R. Scobie with:
James R. Scobie United States
Gilbert M. Joseph United States
Barry Carr Australia
Carl E. Solberg United States
Daniel Nugent United States
Emília Viotti da Costa United States
Tulio Halperín Donghi United States
Erick D. Langer United States
Alexander Woodside Canada
E. Bradford Burns United States
John Womack relative to James R. Scobie United States James R. Scobie's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
James R. Scobie · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Womack

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Womack's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Womack with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Womack more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Womack

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Womack. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Womack. The network helps show where John Womack may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside John Womack, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Womack Line = papers co-authored together John Womack links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1969234
2 199985
3 197749
4 198630
5 197029
6 197028
7 199123
8 196921
9 197717
10 200511
11 199610
12 19689
13 19779
14
Zapata y la Revolución Mexicana
19698
15 19777
16
La economía de México durante la Revolución, 1910-1920: historiografía y análisis
20126
17 19966
18 19706
19 19706
20 19684

About John Womack

John Womack is a scholar working on Demography, Political Science and International Relations, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Cultural Studies and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 35 papers that have together received 622 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Studies in Latin America (10 papers), Politics and Society in Latin America (9 papers), Mexican Socioeconomic and Environmental Dynamics (7 papers), Political Dynamics in Latin America (7 papers), Political and Social Dynamics in Chile and Latin America (6 papers), Latin American and Latino Studies (5 papers), Latin American rural development (3 papers) and Agricultural and Food Production Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (106 citations), Political Science and International Relations (293 citations), Anthropology (112 citations), Development (24 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (285 citations). John Womack has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael Cobas Meyer, Kenneth Maxwell, James D. Cockcroft, Frederick C. Turner, Rodney D. Anderson, Samuel Brunk, Ramón Eduardo Ruíz, Arturo Warman, Daniel Cosío Villegas and Friedrich Katz. Their work appears in journals such as Hispanic American Historical Review, Foreign Affairs, The American Historical Review, Political Science Quarterly and Labor Studies in Working-Class History of the Americas.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact