John D. Griffith

769 citations
13 papers · 556 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

John D. Griffith

13 papers receiving 493 citations

Peers

John D. Griffith
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Toxicology 78
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 321
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 155
  • Biological Psychiatry 23
  • Pharmacology 124
Replace Geoffrey K. Mumford with:
Geoffrey K. Mumford United States
Lisa H. Brauer United States
Cole Jo United States
Dan Creson United States
J D Sapira United States
Eric Rubin United States
Thorne Sparkman United States
Michael A. Sherer United States
A. B. Wolbach United States
Donald R. Sweeney United States
John D. Griffith relative to Geoffrey K. Mumford United States Geoffrey K. Mumford's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Geoffrey K. Mumford · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John D. Griffith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John D. Griffith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John D. Griffith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John D. Griffith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John D. Griffith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John D. Griffith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John D. Griffith. The network helps show where John D. Griffith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside John D. Griffith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John D. Griffith Line = papers co-authored together John D. Griffith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 1972199
2 198665
3 197562
4
Bupropion: clinical assay for amphetamine-like abuse potential.
198360
5 197438
6 197728
7 197122
8 197521
9 197220
10 197016
11 196911
12 19768
13 20066

About John D. Griffith

John D. Griffith is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Toxicology, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Pharmacology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 556 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (9 papers), Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (6 papers), Psychedelics and Drug Studies (4 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (2 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (2 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (1 paper), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (1 paper) and Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (78 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (321 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (155 citations), Biological Psychiatry (23 citations) and Pharmacology (124 citations). John D. Griffith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Bulgaria and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Donald R. Jasinski, John G. Nutt, Gordon R. McKinney, John H. Cavanaugh, Loren L. Miller, John A. Oates, Charles A. Haertzen, William E. Bunney, William E. Fann and David S. Janowsky. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Science, The American Journal of Medicine, Psychopharmacology and Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact