John Crosbie

29 papers receiving 658 citations

Peers

John Crosbie
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 302
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 165
  • Statistics and Probability 65
  • Clinical Psychology 128
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 64
Replace George Semb with:
George Semb United States
Michael A. Seaman United States
Mary J. Naus United States
Leon Pesotchinsky United States
Esperanza Báusela Herreras Spain
Raymond F. Koopman Canada
Richard L. Hagen United States
James G. Holland United States
Adam Oei Singapore
Duncan McArthur United States
John Crosbie relative to George Semb United States George Semb's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
George Semb · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Crosbie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Crosbie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Crosbie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Crosbie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Crosbie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Crosbie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Crosbie. The network helps show where John Crosbie may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside John Crosbie, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Crosbie Line = papers co-authored together John Crosbie links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993188
2 1993164
3 198739
4 199832
5 198830
6 199923
7 199022
8 199322
9 199021
10 199720
11 199419
12 198917
13 200015
14 199713
15 198912
16 199811
17 19938
18 19988
19 19877
20 19866

About John Crosbie

John Crosbie is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Statistics and Probability, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Social Psychology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 702 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral and Psychological Studies (14 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (8 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (3 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (3 papers), Coffee research and impacts (2 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (2 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (2 papers) and Outdoor and Experiential Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (302 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (165 citations), Statistics and Probability (65 citations), Clinical Psychology (128 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (64 citations). John Crosbie has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Glenn Kelly, Jack E. James, Jim Hamill, Ann D. Crocker, Christopher F. Sharpley, Kathryn J. Saunders, Jennifer M. O’Donnell, Dean C. Williams, Kennon A. Lattal and J. H. Court. Their work appears in journals such as The Psychological Record, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, The Behavior Analyst, International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management and Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact