John Chadam

3.3k citations
68 papers · 2.7k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

John Chadam

67 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

John Chadam
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Mathematical Physics 452
  • Environmental Engineering 541
  • Paleontology 244
  • Geophysics 416
  • Applied Mathematics 291
Replace William Parry with:
William Parry United States
Francis Hirsch France
Philip D. Rabinowitz United States
Richard W. Jordan Japan
Dennis E. White United States
P. Ortoleva United States
Kai‐Jun Zhang China
Johanna Tamminen Finland
Paul Sacks United States
William I. Newman United States
John Chadam relative to William Parry United States William Parry's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
William Parry · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Chadam

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Chadam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Chadam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Chadam more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Chadam

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Chadam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Chadam. The network helps show where John Chadam may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Chadam, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Chadam Line = papers co-authored together John Chadam links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 68 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1987317
2 1987288
3 1988259
4 1986213
5 1980140
6 1983130
7 197599
8 199296
9 197381
10 200777
11 197467
12 198861
13 198657
14 197852
15 199445
16 199244
17 200743
18
THE EARLY EXERCISE BOUNDARY FOR THE AMERICAN PUT NEAR EXPIRY: NUMERICAL APPROXIMATION
199940
19 197636
20 199134

About John Chadam

John Chadam is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Mathematical Physics, Finance, Materials Chemistry and Applied Mathematics, having authored 68 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (23 papers), Stochastic processes and financial applications (11 papers), Advanced Mathematical Physics Problems (10 papers), Solidification and crystal growth phenomena (9 papers), Spectral Theory in Mathematical Physics (7 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (7 papers), Numerical methods in inverse problems (6 papers) and Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Mathematical Physics (452 citations), Environmental Engineering (541 citations), Paleontology (244 citations), Geophysics (416 citations) and Applied Mathematics (291 citations). John Chadam has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Italy. Frequent co-authors include P. Ortoleva, Amartya Sen, E. Merino, Robert T. Glassey, Rainer Grün, Henry P. Schwarcz, Enrique Merino, Xinfu Chen, Hong‐Ming Yin and Anthony Peirce. Their work appears in journals such as SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, European Journal of Applied Mathematics, SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications and American Journal of Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact