John C. Cox

100 papers receiving 3.5k citations

John C. Cox's Hit Papers

Adjuvants—a classification and review of their modes of action 1997 · 564 citations
5640+9+19Years since publication100200300400500

Peers

John C. Cox
Comparison fields: 5 of 170
  • Parasitology 374
  • Immunology 824
  • Finance 392
  • Microbiology 198
  • Virology 124
Replace Michael W. Taylor with:
Michael W. Taylor New Zealand
Robert A. Feldman United States
John C. Reeder Papua New Guinea
Paul R. Langford United Kingdom
Brian J. McCarthy United States
Yingchun Liu China
Guillaume Duménil France
James S. Robertson United Kingdom
Banchob Sripa Thailand
John C. Cox relative to Michael W. Taylor New Zealand Michael W. Taylor's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.4×
Michael W. Taylor · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John C. Cox

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John C. Cox's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John C. Cox with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John C. Cox more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John C. Cox

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John C. Cox. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John C. Cox. The network helps show where John C. Cox may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John C. Cox, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John C. Cox Line = papers co-authored together John C. Cox links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 100 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Adjuvants—a classification and review of their modes of action
Hit paper breakdown →
1997564
2 1976359
3 1998153
4 1992131
5 1978122
6 2007115
7 1986106
8 1979102
9 1977102
10 200395
11 198294
12 197992
13 199190
14 198183
15 200183
16 198378
17 198672
18 198061
19 197857
20 199557

About John C. Cox

John C. Cox is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology, Immunology and Parasitology, having authored 100 papers that have together received 3.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics (10 papers), Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (10 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (8 papers), Dermatological diseases and infestations (7 papers), Metal Extraction and Bioleaching (6 papers), Diphtheria, Corynebacterium, and Tetanus (5 papers), T-cell and B-cell Immunology (5 papers) and Influenza Virus Research Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Parasitology (374 citations), Immunology (824 citations), Finance (392 citations), Microbiology (198 citations) and Virology (124 citations). John C. Cox has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include A.R. Coulter, Fischer Black, W. John Ingledew, Debbie Drane, Howard Gest, David H. Boxer, Anders Sjölander, Ian Barr, John Cobley and Michael T. Madigan. Their work appears in journals such as Vaccine, Journal of Immunological Methods, Journal of Bacteriology, Research in Veterinary Science and Laboratory Animals.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact