Laboratory Animals

2.9k papers and 51.3k indexed citations

About

The 2.9k papers published in Laboratory Animals in the last decades have received a total of 51.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Laboratory Animals usually cover Small Animals (853 papers), Animal Science and Zoology (404 papers) and Molecular Biology (354 papers) specifically the topics of Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia (367 papers), Animal testing and alternatives (337 papers) and Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (233 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Laboratory Animals are Udo Albus, Paul Flecknell, Vera Baumans, Michael F. W. Festing, Ralf Weiskirchen, I. Anna S. Olsson, J. V. Roughan, Trevor B. Poole, L.F.M. van Zutphen and Klaus Gärtner.

In The Last Decade

Laboratory Animals

2.7k papers receiving 46.6k citations

Fields of papers published in Laboratory Animals

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Laboratory Animals. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Laboratory Animals.

Countries where authors publish in Laboratory Animals

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Laboratory Animals. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Laboratory Animals with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laboratory Animals more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026