John Breen

885 citations
33 papers · 727 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

John Breen

31 papers receiving 692 citations

Peers

John Breen
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Insect Science 355
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 472
  • Genetics 325
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 136
  • Ecological Modeling 46
Replace Christian Platner with:
Christian Platner Germany
Carlos Frankl Sperber Brazil
Jacques Mériguet France
Daniele Sommaggio Italy
Sandra J. DeBano United States
Aaron L. Iverson United States
Franziska Peter Germany
Deepa Senapathi United Kingdom
Zdeněk Laštůvka Czechia
Robert W. Sites United States
John Breen relative to Christian Platner Germany Christian Platner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Christian Platner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Breen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Breen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Breen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Breen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Breen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Breen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Breen. The network helps show where John Breen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Breen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Breen Line = papers co-authored together John Breen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007171
2 200296
3 200267
4 200857
5 199752
6 200640
7 201130
8 201129
9 200426
10 201018
11 200618
12 201017
13 201013
14 201313
15 201613
16 197910
17 20139
18 19999
19
Collecting, describing and evaluating root crops.
19857
20 20056

About John Breen

John Breen is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 727 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (12 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (11 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (7 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (6 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (3 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (3 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (3 papers) and Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (355 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (472 citations), Genetics (325 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (136 citations) and Ecological Modeling (46 citations). John Breen has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United Kingdom and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Mary F. Coffey, Mark J. F. Brown, Jeremy A. Thomas, Robert J. Paxton, G. W. Elmes, J. C. Wardlaw, M. Gardner, Úna Fitzpatrick, Karsten Schönrogge and Tomás E. Murray. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, Journal of Apicultural Research, Ecological Engineering, Pedobiologia and Apidologie.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact