John Berkman

478 citations
18 papers · 192 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

John Berkman

17 papers receiving 146 citations

Peers

John Berkman
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Philosophy 36
  • Reproductive Medicine 19
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 43
  • General Health Professions 39
  • Religious studies 7
Replace Christopher Tollefsen with:
Christopher Tollefsen United States
Melissa Lane United States
Catherine Mills Australia
Kenneth A. Richman United States
Terrance McConnell United States
Francis J. Beckwith United States
Tina Rulli United States
Stephanie Lloyd Canada
Peter Herissone-Kelly United Kingdom
Lewis Vaughn
John Berkman relative to Christopher Tollefsen United States Christopher Tollefsen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Christopher Tollefsen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Berkman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Berkman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Berkman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Berkman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Berkman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Berkman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Berkman. The network helps show where John Berkman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside John Berkman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Berkman Line = papers co-authored together John Berkman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2004128
2
The Pinckaers Reader: Renewing Thomistic Moral Theology
200524
3
Searching for a Universal Ethic: Multidisciplinary, Ecumenical, and Interfaith Responses to the Catholic Natural Law Tradition
20147
4 19926
5 20045
6 20134
7 20033
8 20032
9 20042
10 19972
11 19942
12 20231
13 20171
14 20201
15
Catholic Moral Theology and the Moral Status of Non-Human Animals
20141
16 20201
17 20211
18 20021

About John Berkman

John Berkman is a scholar working on Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 18 papers that have together received 192 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theology and Philosophy of Evil (6 papers), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (6 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (2 papers), Religion, Ecology, and Ethics (2 papers), Catholicism and Religious Studies (2 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (2 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers) and Karl Barth and Christian Theology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (36 citations), Reproductive Medicine (19 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (43 citations), General Health Professions (39 citations) and Religious studies (7 citations). John Berkman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Stanley Hauerwas, James F. Childress, John H. Evans, Jeffrey Stout and Gilbert Meilaender. Their work appears in journals such as The Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly Review, Christian bioethics Non-Ecumenical Studies in Medical Morality, logos, Studies in Christian Ethics and Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact