Studies in Christian Ethics

1.1k citations
554 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Christian Theology and Mission
    • Biblical Studies and Interpretation
    • Theology and Philosophy of Evil

Papers in

    • Christian Theology and Mission 56
    • Biblical Studies and Interpretation 51
    • Theology and Philosophy of Evil 101
    • Medieval Philosophy and Theology 51
    • War, Ethics, and Justification 42

Studies in Christian Ethics

314 papers receiving 734 citations

Peers

Studies in Christian Ethics
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Religious studies 197
  • Philosophy 284
  • Sociology and Political Science 517
  • Health 72
  • Political Science and International Relations 181
Replace Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics with:
Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics United States
Dialog United States
Koers - Bulletin for Christian Scholarship South Africa
Literature and Theology United Kingdom
Temenos - Nordic Journal for the Study of Religion Finland
Japanese Journal of Religious Studies United States
Christian bioethics Non-Ecumenical Studies in Medical Morality United States
Journal for the Study of Religion Nature and Culture United States
International Journal of Hindu Studies United States
Worldviews Global Religions Culture and Ecology United States
Studies in Christian Ethics relative to Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics United States Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Studies in Christian Ethics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Studies in Christian Ethics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Studies in Christian Ethics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Studies in Christian Ethics more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Studies in Christian Ethics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Studies in Christian Ethics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Studies in Christian Ethics.

About Studies in Christian Ethics

The 554 papers published in Studies in Christian Ethics in the last decades have received a total of 1.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Studies in Christian Ethics usually cover Religious studies (111 papers), Philosophy (206 papers), Political Science and International Relations (124 papers), Sociology and Political Science (212 papers) and History (38 papers) specifically the topics of Theology and Philosophy of Evil (101 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (68 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (57 papers), Christian Theology and Mission (56 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (52 papers), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (51 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (51 papers) and War, Ethics, and Justification (42 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Studies in Christian Ethics are Luke Bretherton, John Milbank, Duncan B. Forrester, Celia Deane‐Drummond, Nigel Biggar, Andrew Louth, John M. Hull, Christine Pohl, David Lyon and Alison Liebling.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact